AE
Anna Eshoo
U.S. House District 16
2022 general election. Election concluded.
Incumbents
No incumbent is running.
Challengers
Campaign finance
Federal Election Commission filings for the 2022 two-year cycle. Candidates appear in the order they are listed on this page. They are not ranked by money, and these measures are never combined into a single score.
Every candidate below reports through Dec 31, 2022.
| Candidate | Total receipts | Cash on hand | Direct PAC receipts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Eshoo Democratic | $2,037,405 | $520,948 | $857,665 |
| Rishi Kumar Democratic | $747,661 | -$1,109 | $0 |
Each measure below has its own scale and starts at zero, so bars can be read against each other within a measure but not across measures. Every figure is reported through Dec 31, 2022.
Total receipts
Everything the authorized campaign committee took in, including contributions, loans, and transfers.
Highest total receipts: Anna Eshoo at $2,037,405. Lowest: Rishi Kumar at $747,661. The largest reported value sets this scale at $2,037,405.
Cash on hand
The balance the campaign reported at the end of its coverage period.
Highest cash on hand: Anna Eshoo at $520,948. Lowest: Rishi Kumar at -$1,109. The largest reported value sets this scale at $520,948.
Direct PAC receipts
Money the campaign received from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.
Highest direct PAC receipts: Anna Eshoo at $857,665. Lowest: Rishi Kumar at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $857,665.
Outside spending supporting
Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate, not coordinated with the campaign and never received by it.
Every compared candidate reported $0 for outside spending supporting. The largest reported value sets this scale at $0.
Outside spending opposing
Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.
Every compared candidate reported $0 for outside spending opposing. The largest reported value sets this scale at $0.
Where each campaign's committee money came from
Each column is one candidate and each figure is that candidate's own money, taken over that candidate's own itemized total. Nothing here is added across candidates, and the two groupings below are never added to each other: the first is who the FEC says runs the giving committee, which covers every dollar, and the second is what interest a source says that committee advances, which is a claim MyRepTracker makes and covers only part of the money.
Contributions each campaign received, by who runs the committee
| Category | Anna Eshoo Democratic | Rishi Kumar Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate PACs | $392,94044.9% | $0 |
| Membership organization PACs | $156,00017.8% | $0 |
| Trade association PACs | $126,00014.4% | $0 |
| Non-connected committees | $93,46210.7% | $5,000100.0% |
| Labor union PACs | $83,0009.5% | $0 |
| Cooperative PACs | $13,5001.5% | $0 |
| Corporations without capital stock | $5,0000.6% | $0 |
| Leadership PACs | $2,5000.3% | $0 |
| Other candidates' committees | $2,0000.2% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $874,402 | $5,000 |
Contributions each campaign received, by interest advanced
| Category | Anna Eshoo Democratic | Rishi Kumar Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Physicians and medical specialties Health | $153,50017.6% | $0 |
| Pharmaceuticals Health | $143,50016.5% | $0 |
| Technology Communications and technology | $72,1408.3% | $0 |
| Health insurance Health | $44,5005.1% | $0 |
| Telecommunications Communications and technology | $31,5003.6% | $0 |
| Public sector unions Labor | $26,5003.0% | $0 |
| Building trades unions Labor | $22,5002.6% | $0 |
| Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate | $21,5002.5% | $0 |
| Hospitals and nursing homes Health | $16,5001.9% | $0 |
| Automotive Transportation | $16,0001.8% | $0 |
| Food and beverage Agriculture | $15,5001.8% | $0 |
| Industrial unions Labor | $15,0001.7% | $0 |
| Nurses and nursing specialties Health | $14,0001.6% | $0 |
| Defense Defense | $13,5001.6% | $0 |
| Accounting Professional services | $12,5001.4% | $0 |
| Lawyers and law firms Professional services | $12,5001.4% | $0 |
| Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate | $11,0001.3% | $0 |
| Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate | $10,0001.1% | $0 |
| Electric utilities Energy and natural resources | $9,0001.0% | $0 |
| Health care unions Labor | $7,5000.9% | $0 |
| Agribusiness Agriculture | $6,5000.7% | $0 |
| Air transport Transportation | $6,5000.7% | $0 |
| Media and entertainment Communications and technology | $6,0000.7% | $0 |
| Construction Construction | $5,0000.6% | $0 |
| Renewable energy Energy and natural resources | $5,0000.6% | $0 |
| Transportation unions Labor | $2,5000.3% | $0 |
| Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate | $1,0000.1% | $0 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $168,76219.4% | $5,000100.0% |
| Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees | $4,500 | $0 |
| Itemized total | $874,402 | $5,000 |
Last-minute contributions reported before an election
Within 48 hours of receiving a contribution or loan of $1,000 or more in the days just before an election, a campaign must notify the FEC. These notices are provisional: the same money appears again in the regular report covering those days, so it is not added to the amounts above and is not compared as a measure. Candidates file them only while their own election is close, so an absence here says nothing about a campaign's fundraising.
| Candidate | Reported on notices | Notices | Covers | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Eshoo Democratic | $104,300 | 27 | May 19 to Nov 4, 2022 | Covered by regular reports |
| Rishi Kumar Democratic | $159,100 | 14 | May 19 to Nov 4, 2022 | $6,800 still provisional |
Direct contributions are money the campaign received. Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with any campaign, and are never added to a candidate's receipts. Source: Federal Election Commission ↗.