Home California Elections 2022 Ami Bera

Ami Bera

Democratic candidate · 2022 general election · California

AB

Ami Bera

Democratic

Races

Campaign finance

FEC data through Dec 31, 2022. Covering the 2022 two-year cycle only.

The 2022 cycle at a glance

Total receipts
$1,545,895
Everything the campaign took in
Individual contributions
$718,519
Itemized and unitemized split not reported
PAC and other committees
$825,215
Received from political committees
Campaign spending
$1,839,781
Total disbursements
Cash on hand
$1,735,133
At the end of the reporting period

Where the money came from

These categories divide total receipts of $1,545,895 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.

Receipts by funding category for the 2022 cycle
SourceAmountShare of receipts
Individual contributions$718,51946.5%
PAC and other committee contributions$825,21553.4%
Party committee contributions$490.0%
Candidate self-funding$00.0%
Loans$00.0%
Other receipts, including transfers$2,1120.1%
Total receipts$1,545,895100%

Financial position

Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Dec 31, 2022 for the 2022 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.

Reported financial position for the 2022 cycle
MeasureAmount
Cash on hand at coverage end$1,735,133
Debts and obligations owed by the committee$172,800
Debts and obligations owed to the committeeNot reported
Contributions refunded to individuals$875
Contributions refunded to committees$0
Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising.$0
Transfers made to other authorized committees$0
Repayments of candidate loans$50,000
Repayments of other loans$0

Calculated from the reported values

Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.

Values calculated from the reported financial position, with the formula for each
MeasureAmountHow it was produced
Contributions net of refunds$1,542,908Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees.
Operating expenditures net of offsetsNot reportedAn input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record.
Outstanding candidate loans-$50,000Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans.
Other outstanding loans$0Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans.
Total contributions refunded$875Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees.

Change since the previous filing

Both columns come from committee C00461061, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what 30G 2022 reported and what YE 2022 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. 30G 2022 reported through Nov 28, 2022 and YE 2022 through Dec 31, 2022.

Financial position at the two most recent controlling filings of committee C00461061
Measure30G 2022Reported through Nov 28, 2022YE 2022Reported through Dec 31, 2022Change
Cash on hand at period end$1,762,068$1,735,133Down $26,935
Debts owed by the committee$172,800$172,800No change
Contribution refunds in the period$5$0Down $5

Cash compared with one period's spending

Cash on hand of $1,735,133 set beside the $30,302 this campaign spent during YE 2022, through Dec 31, 2022, which is 57.3 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.

Outside spending

Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Ami Bera. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.

Spent supporting

$1,269,304
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

Spent opposing

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

What the money was spent on

These categories divide $1,605,796 of itemized spending across 623 transactions, through Dec 29, 2022. That subtotal covers the FEC's published operating-expenditure records, which do not include transfers, loan repayments, refunds, or contributions the campaign made, and is 87.3% of the $1,839,781 in total disbursements reported for the 2022 cycle. Every share below is a share of that subtotal and never of total spending. Purposes were classified under taxonomy spend-1.3.

Two things separate that subtotal from total disbursements. Spending reported without itemization cannot be categorized. And the itemized records run only to Dec 29, 2022, while the totals above cover through Dec 31, 2022, so the last stretch of the reporting period is summarized but not yet broken down here.

Itemized spending by reported purpose for the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Advertising and media $395,82824.6%43
Fundraising and solicitation $366,60722.8%25
Unclassified filing descriptions Spending whose reported purpose could not be placed in the taxonomy. It is counted, not guessed at. $302,13218.8%96
Administration, salary, and overhead $176,17211.0%392
Contributions and donations made $125,4257.8%5
Polling and research $77,7504.8%3
Legal, accounting, and compliance $58,4473.6%23
Campaign materials $51,7823.2%7
Technology and digital services $35,0992.2%9
Travel $13,8730.9%6
Events $2,6800.2%14
Classified$1,303,66481.2%
Unclassified filing descriptions$302,13218.8%
Itemized spending categorized here$1,605,796100%623

Political committees that contributed directly

Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.

Top 5 of 209 shown $846,717 total · $54,500 shown here

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Political committees ranked by direct contributions
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1ABBOTT LABORATORIES EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00040279$12,5001.5%4Sep 6, 2022
2AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAJ PAC) C00024521$12,0001.4%6Sep 20, 2022
3AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00000422$10,0001.2%5Sep 28, 2022
4CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS C00001016$10,0001.2%2Aug 3, 2022
5AMERICAN HOTEL AND LODGING ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE ('HOTELPAC') C00001198$10,0001.2%3Sep 13, 2022
Show the complete list of 209 committees →

Organizations spending independently

Supporting Ami Bera

All 2 shown $1,269,304 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Organizations ranked by independent spending supporting this candidate
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1HONORING AMERICAN LAW ENFORCEMENT PAC C00710178$889,16870.1%131Dec 9, 2021
2LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR A SAFER AMERICA PAC C00681825$380,13629.9%137Dec 9, 2021

Opposing Ami Bera

No opposing independent expenditures are reported for this cycle.

What that outside spending purchased

Each independent expenditure carries a short description the spending committee wrote, and these categories are those descriptions sorted under taxonomy outside-1.0. Spending supporting Ami Bera and spending opposing them are broken down separately and never combined, and every share below is a share of that one direction's total.

The largest category is usually "Advertising, medium not specified". That is not a leftover: it is spending the committee described only as a media buy or as advertising, without saying whether it aired on television, ran online, or arrived in the mail. MyRepTracker reports what was filed rather than assigning it a medium.

Supporting Ami Bera

Independent spending supporting this candidate, by reported purpose for the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Phone calls and text messages $995,62378.4%176
Unclassified filing descriptions Spending whose reported description could not be placed in the taxonomy. It is counted, not guessed at. $273,68021.6%92
Classified$995,62378.4%
Unclassified filing descriptions$273,68021.6%
Total independent spending$1,269,304100%268

Opposing Ami Bera

No independent expenditures in this direction are reported for this cycle.

Fundraising channels

Some money arrives through a committee that raised or collected it rather than from a committee that decided to give it. Those committees are listed here instead of among the political committees that contributed, because calling a payment processor or a shared fundraising account a donor would say something the filings do not. None of this is added to, or subtracted from, any total above.

Conduits

A conduit forwards contributions that individuals earmarked for a named candidate. The amounts below come from the receiving campaign's conduit memo records and remain part of its reported individual-contribution total; they are not added to receipts again. MyRepTracker groups only memos carrying a registered conduit committee's FEC ID and does not decode or store contributor names, addresses, employers, occupations, or memo text. The record count is a count of FEC memo records, not donors.

Conduit records shown through Dec 31, 2022 · fetched Sep 8, 2026.

1 organization shown $0 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Registered conduits ranked by individuals' earmarked contributions routed through them
RankCommitteeAmountShareFEC memo recordsLast activity
1ACTBLUE C00401224$0Not available2May 31, 2022

Who the committees behind this money were

Every committee here is placed by the registration it filed with the FEC for the 2022 cycle: its designation, its committee type, and the organizational form it reported. That is the FEC's own record and involves no judgement by MyRepTracker, so this covers every itemized dollar. A committee's registration can change between cycles, and each cycle is judged by its own.

Contributed to Ami Bera

Committees itemized $846,717 in contributions to this campaign.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Corporate PACs $336,86139.8%96175
Membership organization PACs $164,90019.5%3185
Trade association PACs $161,54619.1%3670
Non-connected committees $106,76212.6%2649
Labor union PACs $51,6006.1%1218
Cooperative PACs $15,0001.8%34
Leadership PACs $10,0001.2%44
Party committees $480.0%11
Itemized total for this direction$846,717

Spent supporting Ami Bera

Committees itemized $1,269,304 in independent spending supporting Ami Bera.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Non-connected committees $1,269,304100.0%2268
Itemized total for this direction$1,269,304

What interests those committees advance

The FEC publishes no industry or interest field, so unlike the section above this one is a claim MyRepTracker makes. A committee is placed here only when there is a document behind the claim that a reader can open: its own statement of organization, its own published mission statement, or a named third party. Every assignment carries that document on the committee's own page. A committee's name is never evidence of anything.

Categorized is not the same as reviewed. Most of these sectors were assigned by machine from the committee's own filing rather than read by a person. Each committee's own page says which of the two its assignment is, and names the document behind it either way.

Coverage is partial on purpose, and the part that is not covered is shown at full size rather than left out. Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees are excluded outright: their giving is an officeholder's or a party's decision, so no interest label describes it. Categories are taxonomy interest-1.7.

Contributed to Ami Bera

Committees itemized $846,717 in contributions to this campaign. $10,048 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $836,669, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $682,807 and committees not yet categorized account for $153,862.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Physicians and medical specialties Health $237,50028.4%37103
Pharmaceuticals Health $95,50011.4%2549
Health insurance Health $33,0003.9%918
Technology Communications and technology $27,0003.2%917
Defense Defense $24,5002.9%416
Food and beverage Agriculture $22,4072.7%912
Building trades unions Labor $20,0002.4%34
Construction Construction $19,5002.3%36
Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate $19,0002.3%410
Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate $18,5002.2%48
Automotive Transportation $16,5002.0%39
Public sector unions Labor $14,0001.7%35
Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate $13,5001.6%36
Lawyers and law firms Professional services $12,0001.4%16
Hospitals and nursing homes Health $11,0001.3%45
Trucking Transportation $11,0001.3%23
Agribusiness Agriculture $10,0001.2%23
Air transport Transportation $10,0001.2%45
Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate $10,0001.2%14
Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate $9,5001.1%26
Telecommunications Communications and technology $8,0001.0%37
Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue $7,9000.9%12
Industrial unions Labor $7,5000.9%12
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue $7,0000.8%17
Accounting Professional services $5,0000.6%11
Media and entertainment Communications and technology $5,0000.6%11
Transportation unions Labor $4,0000.5%12
Electric utilities Energy and natural resources $2,0000.2%22
Mining Energy and natural resources $1,0000.1%11
Nurses and nursing specialties Health $1,0000.1%11
Committees not yet categorized $153,86218.4%5980
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $10,048Not applicable55
Base the shares are taken over$836,669100%
Itemized total for this direction$846,717

Spent supporting Ami Bera

Committees itemized $1,269,304 in independent spending supporting Ami Bera. Of that, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $0 and committees not yet categorized account for $1,269,304.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Committees not yet categorized $1,269,304100.0%2268
Base the shares are taken over$1,269,304100%
Itemized total for this direction$1,269,304

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.

Reported on notices

$118,700
Across 12 notices, received May 19, 2022 to Nov 4, 2022

Still only provisional

$0
Every notice is now covered by a regular report

The most recent notice was filed on Nov 5, 2022. A notice stops being the only record of its money once a regular report covers the same days; those are marked reconciled below and the amounts appear in Ami Bera's reported totals through the ordinary schedule.

48-hour notices filed for the 2022 cycle, newest first
FiledAmountEntriesCoversStateFiling
Nov 5, 2022$16,0005Nov 4 to Nov 4, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 3, 2022$15,4004Nov 1 to Nov 1, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 30, 2022$2,5001Oct 28 to Oct 28, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 28, 2022$5,0003Oct 27 to Oct 27, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 26, 2022$8,5004Oct 24 to Oct 25, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 25, 2022 amendment$5,5003Oct 21 to Oct 21, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 22, 2022$3,5002Oct 20 to Oct 20, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Jun 5, 2022$4,5002Jun 3 to Jun 3, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Jun 2, 2022$28,00010May 31 to Jun 1, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
May 27, 2022$5,0002May 26 to May 26, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗

The 10 most recent notices of 12 are listed. The amount and count above cover all of them.

Where the individual money was reported from

Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $601,375 of the $718,519 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 1,901 itemized contributions.

From California

$462,954
77.0% of the itemized money that has a place

From everywhere else

$138,421
23.0% of the itemized money that has a place

Money from outside California is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.

What kind of place it came from

Itemized individual contributions by kind of place, 2022 cycle
Kind of placeAmountContributionsShare
States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia.$601,3751,901100.0%

Places, largest first

Top 10 of 29 places shown as bars. Every place is in the table below.

  • California this campaign's state $462,954
  • District of Columbia $28,950
  • New York $24,430
  • Kentucky $11,600
  • Florida $10,100
  • Virginia $9,650
  • Massachusetts $7,610
  • Washington $6,400
  • Maryland $6,250
  • Hawaii $5,800
Every place with itemized individual contributions reported for the 2022 cycle
PlaceAmountContributionsShare
California this campaign's state$462,9541,69177.0%
District of Columbia$28,950344.8%
New York$24,430464.1%
Kentucky$11,60041.9%
Florida$10,100201.7%
Virginia$9,650151.6%
Massachusetts$7,610171.3%
Washington$6,40051.1%
Maryland$6,250101.0%
Hawaii$5,80021.0%
Ohio$5,25050.9%
Illinois$4,25060.7%
Georgia$2,90040.5%
Indiana$2,90010.5%
Nevada$2,00010.3%
Texas$1,95040.3%
Colorado$1,565110.3%
Iowa$1,00010.2%
North Carolina$1,00010.2%
South Carolina$1,00020.2%
Connecticut$760110.1%
New Jersey$55020.1%
Kansas$50010.1%
New Hampshire$50010.1%
Tennessee$50010.1%
Louisiana$2562<0.1%
Michigan$2501<0.1%
Oregon$2501<0.1%
Pennsylvania$2501<0.1%
Reported with a place$601,3751,901100%

Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.

How this compares

Compared with U.S. House campaigns in California, 2022 cycle: 120 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

  • This campaign $1,545,895
  • Cohort median $1,024,853
Total receipts for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in California, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$1,545,895
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$116,486
Median$1,024,853
75th percentile$2,390,121
Highest in the cohort$28,295,640
Campaigns counted120

73 of the 120 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 61th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Share of receipts from political committees

Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.

  • This campaign 53.4%
  • Cohort median 10.4%
Share of receipts from political committees for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in California, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign53.4%
Lowest in the cohort0.0%
25th percentile1.8%
Median10.4%
75th percentile34.1%
Highest in the cohort100.0%
Campaigns counted118

101 of the 118 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 86th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Cash on hand

The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.

  • This campaign $1,735,133
  • Cohort median $44,893
Cash on hand for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in California, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$1,735,133
Lowest in the cohort-$1,109
25th percentile$2,394
Median$44,893
75th percentile$456,537
Highest in the cohort$21,022,960
Campaigns counted120

109 of the 120 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 91th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.

  • This campaign $1,269,304
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending supporting for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in California, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$1,269,304
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$12,425
Highest in the cohort$3,123,125
Campaigns counted120

116 of the 120 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 97th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending opposing for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in California, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$8,037,240
Campaigns counted120

0 of the 120 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.

What these numbers mean

Receipts are not the same as contributions
Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
Direct contributions are not outside spending
A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
The organizations named here are political committees
Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
A cycle may be only partly reported
Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
This view is cycle specific
It covers the 2022 two-year cycle only.

Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.