SB 986 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Major regulations.

Summary
(1) Existing law, known as the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) , governs the procedures for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of regulations by state agencies and for the review of those regulatory actions by the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) . The APA requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal an administrative regulation to, among other things, assess the potential for adverse economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals, and requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation to prepare and submit to the Department of Finance for review, a standardized regulatory impact analysis, as provided. The APA defines "major regulation," for purposes of the act, to mean any proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation subject to review by the OAL that will have an economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals in an amount exceeding $50,000,000, as provided. The APA provides exceptions for emergency regulations in the case of a situation that calls for immediate action to avoid serious harm to the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. This bill would prohibit a major regulation from taking effect until submission to, and expiration of a 60-day review period by, the Legislature, except as provided for emergency regulations. The bill would, prior to the expiration of the 60-day review period, require the Legislature to hold an informational hearing on the major regulation. The bill would authorize the Legislature to reject a major regulation during the review period by adoption of a concurrent resolution, and would prohibit a major regulation that has been rejected from taking effect, as specified. If the Legislature does not adopt a concurrent resolution rejecting the regulation within the 60-day review period, the bill would require that the regulation become effective. (2) The APA requires every agency subject to its provisions to prepare, submit to the OAL with the notice of proposed action, as specified, and make available to the public upon request, specified information, including an initial statement of reasons for proposing the adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation. The APA requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation to satisfy additional requirements, including by requiring the state agency to prepare a standardized regulatory impact analysis in the manner prescribed by the Department of Finance, as specified. The APA requires the OAL to review all regulations adopted, amended, or repealed and submitted to it for publication in the California Code of Regulations Supplement and for transmittal to the Secretary of State and make determinations using all of the specified standards, including necessity. This bill would require every agency subject to its provisions to also submit the above-described specified information to the Legislature and would remove the condition that the information be prepared, submitted, and made available upon request. The bill would require the notice of proposed action to include a determination of whether the regulation is a major regulation, as specified, and would require the standardized regulatory impact analysis for a major regulation to address, among other things, the estimated effect on state revenue.
Bill status died 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 5, 2026 Last action May 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

03/26/26 - Amended Senate 04/15/26 - Amended Senate · 5 edits · Apr 15, 2026
MODERATE
SB 986 undergoes a fundamental policy reversal in how the Legislature handles major regulations. Previously, if the Legislature took no action within 60 days, a major regulation was deemed disapproved (a negative veto). The amended version flips this: inaction now means the regulation becomes effective, and the Legislature must actively reject it by adopting a concurrent resolution to block it. The bill also adds a requirement for an informational hearing before the 60-day period expires and removes Section 11350 from its scope.
REQUIREMENT

The default outcome when the Legislature takes no action on a major regulation within 60 days changed from 'deemed disapproved' to 'become effective.' This is a complete reversal of the approval mechanism - previously inaction killed the regulation, now inaction lets it take effect.

The Legislature is now required to hold an informational hearing on each major regulation prior to the expiration of the 60-day review period.

ENFORCEMENT

The Legislature is authorized to reject a major regulation during the review period by adoption of a concurrent resolution, and a rejected major regulation is prohibited from taking effect.

A provision authorizing courts to consider an agency's determination of whether a regulation is a major regulation in declaratory relief actions was removed entirely.

SCOPE

Section 11350 of the Government Code was removed from the list of sections the bill amends, narrowing the bill's reach.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
13
Key actions
4
Committee
3
Amendments
3
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 16, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 14. Noes 0. Page 3865.) (April 14).
upper
Mar 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Feb 18, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and JUD.
upper
Feb 5, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors