911 emergency system.
Summary
Existing law requires the Office of Emergency Services to develop a plan and timeline of target dates for the testing, implementation, and operation of a Next Generation 911 emergency communication system, including text to 911 service, throughout California. This bill would require the office to provide quarterly reports to the Legislature on the development, implementation, and spending on the Next Generation 911 system, as specified.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 5, 2026
Last action Aug 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
02/05/26 - Introduced
→
03/23/26 - Amended Senate
·
4 edits
·
Mar 23, 2026
MODERATE
The Senate amendment to SB 985 adds a short title ('Fix 911 Act'), adds Senator Seyarto as a co-author and three additional coauthors, and most significantly removes the existing $0.80 per month cap on the 911 surcharge, replacing it with an unspecified amount to be determined. The removal of the cap is the key policy change, as it would allow the Office of Emergency Services to set the surcharge above or below the current ceiling.
SCOPE
A new Section 1 was added giving the bill the short title 'Fix 911 Act,' providing a public-facing name for the legislation.
FISCAL
The $0.80 per month cap on the 911 surcharge (Revenue and Taxation Code Section 41030(b)(1)) was removed and replaced with a blank amount to be filled in, meaning the maximum surcharge is no longer fixed by statute.
TECHNICAL
Senator Seyarto was added as a co-author alongside Senator Strickland, and Senators Jones, Niello, and Ochoa Bogh were added as additional coauthors.
Section numbering was adjusted to accommodate the new short title section, though the amendment appears to contain a numbering error with two sections both labeled 'SEC. 2.'
Floor votes · Senate May 22, 2026
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 40
May 22, 2026
D
Democratic30
83% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jul 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on C. & C. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 15). Re-referred to Com. on C. & C.
lower
Jun 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.M.
lower
Jun 1, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.M and C. & C.
lower
May 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 4418.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4260.) (May 14).
upper
Apr 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
April 27 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3864.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.M.
upper
Mar 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on E.M. (Ayes 15. Noes 0. Page 3589.) (March 17).
upper
Feb 18, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E., U & C. and E.M.
upper
Feb 5, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 985
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 985. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline