Digital financial assets: stablecoins.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Digital Financial Assets Law, prohibits a person, on or after July 1, 2026, from engaging in digital financial asset business activity, or holding itself out as being able to engage in digital financial asset business activity, with, or on behalf of, a resident, unless any of certain criteria are met, including that the person is licensed with the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, as prescribed, or the person submits an application on or before July 1, 2026, and is awaiting approval or denial of that application. This bill would revise the above-described latter criterion to specify that the person submits a completed application, as provided. The Digital Financial Assets Law authorizes the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation to issue a conditional license to an applicant who holds or maintains a license to conduct virtual currency business activity in the State of New York, as specified, provided the license was issued or approved no later than January 1, 2023. This bill would revise the above-described authorization to require that the license be issued or approved no later than January 1, 2025. (2) The Digital Financial Assets Law defines "digital financial asset business activity" to mean any of specified activities, including, among others, exchanging, transferring, or storing a digital financial asset, as specified, or exchanging one or more digital representations of value used within one or more online games, game platforms, or family of games, as provided. This bill would remove exchanging one or more digital representations of value used within one or more online games, game platforms, or family of games from the definition of "digital financial business activity." The bill would specify that a "digital financial asset" does not include, among other things, a transaction in which a merchant grants digital representations of value that primarily relate to an affinity or rewards program, as provided, or a digital representation of value issued by or on behalf of a publisher and used primarily within online games or game platforms and that is not otherwise a digital financial asset. The Digital Financial Assets Law declares that its provisions do not apply to specified activity, including by a person who does not receive compensation for providing digital financial asset products or services or for conducting financial asset business activity or that is engaged in testing products or services with the person's own funds. This bill would specify that the above-described exclusion includes a person who merely retains the ability to terminate, suspend, or interrupt a digital financial transaction solely to prevent unauthorized or fraudulent activity and who is not compensated for that service. The Digital Financial Assets Law prohibits a covered person from exchanging, transferring, or storing a digital financial asset that is a stablecoin or engaging in digital financial asset administration of a stablecoin, as specified, unless certain conditions are met. However, existing law authorizes a covered person to exchange, transfer, or store a stablecoin or engage in digital financial asset administration of that stablecoin, as specified, if the stablecoin is approved by the commissioner and complies with certain requirements, restrictions, or prohibitions established by the commissioner. This bill would repeal the above-described provisions related to stablecoins. (3) The Digital Financial Assets Law requires a licensee to submit an annual report, as provided, containing specified information, including a description of any data security breach or cybersecurity event of the licensee. Existing law requires a licensee to file with the department, as applicable, a report of, among other things, a change in the licensee's business for the conduct of its digital financial asset business activity with, or on behalf of, a resident that meets one of specified criteria, including that the proposed change might raise safety and soundness or operational concerns. This bill would revise the above-described annual report to instead include a description of any material data security breach or cybersecurity event of the licensee. The bill would revise the specified criteria in the requirement to file the above-described report of a change in the licensee's business to instead include that the proposed change might raise material safety and soundness or operational concerns. Before engaging in digital financial asset business activity with a resident, the Digital Financial Assets Law requires a covered person, defined as a person required to obtain a license pursuant to that law, to disclose, as provided, certain information, including the resident's right to at least 14 days' prior notice of specified changes that have a material impact on digital financial asset business activity with the resident, or the policies applicable to the resident's account. Existing law requires a covered exchange, as provided, to certify on a form provided by the department that the covered exchange has taken specified actions, except for any digital financial asset approved for listing on or before January 1, 2023. In a transaction for or with a resident, existing law prohibits the covered exchange from interjecting a third party between the covered exchange and the best market for the digital financial asset in a manner inconsistent with specified requirements. This bill would prohibit the 14-day notice requirement from applying to changes in terms, conditions, or policies that are reasonably necessary to address a risk of loss to the resident or covered person, to the extent that the change does not relate to the fee schedule. The bill would instead exclude from the above-described certification requirement a digital financial asset approved for listing on or before January 1, 2025. The bill would require a covered person to provide and make available an up-to-date description of the order execution practices of the covered person, as specified. The bill would exempt a transaction in which a resident receives stablecoin, as defined, in exchange for legal tender or bank or credit union credit from the above-described prohibition against interjecting a third party. The Digital Financial Assets Law requires an applicant, as provided, to create, and during licensure, maintain in a record specified policies and procedures. Existing law requires these policies and procedures be disclosed separately from other disclosures made available to a resident, as specified, except for, among other things, an adopted information security program or an operational security program. This bill would instead exclude from the above-described requirement to disclose separately from other disclosures programs with information that is sensitive to potential security risks, as specified. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Senate Passage
Jun 2026
Assembly Passage
Jun 2026
Signed into Law
Jun 2026
Introduced Jan 23, 2025
Signed Jun 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 8 comparisons
What changed between versions
06/30/26 - Chaptered
→
SB97
·
1 edit
MINOR
This diff reflects a change in document presentation format rather than substantive policy changes. The 'From version' is the official chaptered (enrolled) text of SB 97 as printed by the Secretary of State, while the 'To version' is a web page rendering of the same bill from the California legislature website. The underlying legal provisions appear identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The document format changed from the official chaptered statutory text (with page headers, line numbers, and formal legislative formatting) to a web page layout that includes navigation menus, search tools, bill metadata (version history, dates), and the legislative counsel's digest presented in a different visual structure. No substantive changes to the legal provisions of SB 97 are apparent between the two versions.
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2025 · Assembly Jun 29, 2026
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Jun 3, 2025
D
Democratic30
93% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
43
Key actions
18
Committee
9
Amendments
10
Jun 30, 2026
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 29, 2026
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-4)
assembly
Jun 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 5075.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jun 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
Urgency clause adopted.
upper
Jun 29, 2026
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 29, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 5913.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jun 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 20, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 20).
lower
Jul 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Jun 17, 2025
Lower · Passed
June 23 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 9, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and P. & C.P.
lower
Jun 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1438.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
Apr 28, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Apr 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 705.) (April 8).
upper
Apr 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 632.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
Mar 19, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
Mar 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 5, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 23, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tim Grayson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 97
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 97. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline