SB 958 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Environmental Quality Act: environmental impacts: building height.

Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would, for purposes of CEQA, prohibit the environmental impacts that are associated with increased building height alone from being considered significant impacts on the environment, if a project meets specified conditions, as provided. Because a lead agency would be required to determine if a project meets the specified conditions, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status passed both 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 2, 2026 Last action Aug 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons

What changed between versions

04/16/26 - Amended Senate 06/15/26 - Amended Assembly · 4 edits · Jun 15, 2026
MODERATE
The Assembly stripped out the entire Midway Rising Specific Plan CEQA exemption (former Section 21080.75) and all associated legislative findings, leaving only the general building-height provision. That provision was renumbered from Section 21081.5 to Section 21080.82. The result is a bill that no longer targets one specific San Diego development but instead sets a broad rule that building-height impacts alone cannot be deemed significant under CEQA if certain conditions are met.
Scope change
The bill's scope narrowed significantly: it went from containing both a one-time, project-specific CEQA exemption for a single San Diego development and a general building-height rule, to containing only the general building-height rule (renumbered). The specific Midway Rising exemption, which was the more controversial and targeted provision, was entirely removed.
SCOPE

The entire project-specific CEQA exemption for the Midway Rising Specific Plan in San Diego (former Section 21080.75) was deleted, along with all legislative findings and declarations justifying it. This exemption would have waived CEQA review for that development entirely if it met conditions including creating at least 4,250 residential units (2,000 affordable), sustainability requirements, and job creation.

All 15 legislative findings (subsections a through o) describing the Midway Rising project's housing, economic, sustainability, and fair-housing benefits were removed from the bill.

TECHNICAL

The general building-height provision was renumbered from Section 21081.5 to Section 21080.82 in the Public Resources Code, changing its placement within the statute but not its substantive content.

A placeholder for Section 21081.5 appears in the new version with no operative text (only the section number), which is likely a drafting artifact or error from the renumbering process.

Floor votes · Senate May 26, 2026 · Assembly Aug 25, 2026

How they voted

370
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
May 26, 2026
D Democratic30
29 Yea 1
96% Yea
R Republican10
8 Yea 2
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
29
Key actions
14
Committee
8
Amendments
8
Aug 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 25, 2026
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 5, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 5).
lower
Jun 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 15, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jun 1, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
May 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4443.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
May 4 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4013.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Apr 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3899.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on E.Q. and L. GOV.
upper
Mar 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 11, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 2, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Akilah Weber Pierson
Akilah Weber Pierson
DDemocratic
CA
39