SB 937 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Law enforcement: flash-bang grenades and explosive breaching charges.

Summary
Existing law prohibits the use of kinetic energy projectiles or chemical agents by any law enforcement agency to disperse any assembly, protest, or demonstration, except in compliance with specified standards. Existing law requires kinetic energy projectiles and chemical agents only to be deployed by a peace officer that has received proper training for crowd control, as specified, or to bring an objectively dangerous and unlawful situation safely and effectively under control and only in accordance with certain requirements, including that de-escalation techniques have been attempted and have failed, kinetic energy projectiles are not aimed at the head, neck, or any other vital organs, and, if the chemical agent to be deployed is tear gas, only a commanding officer at the scene of the assembly, protest, or demonstration may authorize the use of tear gas. This bill would expand the above prohibition and exception to include flash-bang grenades, as defined. The bill would define law enforcement agency as any department or agency of the state or any local government, special district, or other political subdivision thereof, that employs any peace officer, as defined, or any federal law enforcement agency. The bill would prohibit the use of flash-bang grenades by any law enforcement agency for the purposes of immigration enforcement, except as specified. The bill would also only allow a commanding officer at the scene to authorize the use of flash-bang grenades. Existing law requires each law enforcement agency to publish specified use of force incidents to the Department of Justice and requires the Department of Justice to publish those reports, as specified. This bill would additionally require law enforcement agencies to report the use of flash-bang grenades. By imposing new duties on local law enforcement agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law prohibits the possession of any destructive device and makes a violation of this prohibition punishable as a misdemeanor or felony. Existing law exempts specified peace officers from this prohibition. This bill would prohibit a peace officer, as defined, from using an explosive breaching charge, as defined, for the purpose of immigration enforcement, except as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. The bill would declare the severability of its provisions.
Bill status passed both 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Jan 29, 2026 Last action Aug 26, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 7 comparisons

What changed between versions

08/28/26 - Enrolled SB937 · 1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The diff reflects a conversion of the formal enrolled legislative document into a web page rendering, adding navigation elements, metadata, and reformatting the text for online display while removing official signature blocks and page numbering.
TECHNICAL

The bill was reformatted from an official enrolled legislative document (with signature blocks, page numbers, and formal headers) into a web page layout with navigation menus, search tools, version history, and metadata fields. The underlying statutory text of Sections 1 through 5 is identical in both versions.

Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2026 · Assembly Aug 25, 2026

How they voted

299
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
May 27, 2026
D Democratic30
29 Yea 1
96% Yea
R Republican10
9 Nay 1
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
27
Key actions
12
Committee
4
Amendments
9
Aug 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 29. Noes 11.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 25, 2026
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (August 13).
lower
Jun 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 9. Page 4485.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4258.) (May 14).
upper
Mar 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 3660.) (March 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 11, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jan 29, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors