SB 906 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Parole: closed session.

Summary
Existing law requires the Board of Parole Hearings to meet with each indeterminately sentenced inmate during the 6th year before the inmate's minimum eligible parole date for the purpose of reviewing and documenting the inmate's activities and conduct pertinent to parole eligibility. One year before the inmate's minimum eligible parole date, existing law requires a panel of the board to meet with the inmate and to grant parole unless the panel or board sitting en banc determines that the gravity of the current convicted offense, or the timing and gravity of current or past convicted offenses, is such that consideration of the public safety requires a more lengthy period of incarceration for the inmate. In certain circumstances, the board will conduct an en banc review, defined as a review conducted by a majority of commissioners holding office on the date the matter is heard by the board, and existing law specifies how the en banc review is required to be conducted. Existing law authorizes the Governor to request a review of a decision by the board to grant or deny parole and, if a request has been made, existing law requires the request to be reviewed by a majority of commissioners, as specified. This bill would instead require that all commissioners participate in an en banc review and a request for review made by the Governor. The bill would also require the en banc review decision and the vote of each commissioner to be a public record. Existing law, the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, requires, with specified exceptions, that all meetings of a state body be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend. Existing law authorizes certain state bodies to hold closed session meetings for certain purposes, including allowing a state body to hold a closed session when considering and acting upon the determination of a term, parole, or release of any individual or other disposition of an individual case. This bill would prohibit an en banc review conducted by the board from being held in a closed session.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 22, 2026 Last action Apr 21, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

01/22/26 - Introduced 03/11/26 - Amended Senate · 6 edits · Mar 11, 2026
MODERATE
SB 906 was substantially expanded from a narrow probation bill about collaborative justice courts into a broader parole transparency measure. The amended version adds requirements that all commissioners (not just a majority) must participate in en banc parole reviews and Governor-requested review requests, makes individual commissioner votes public records, and prohibits en banc reviews from being held in closed session. These changes increase accountability and public oversight of the Board of Parole Hearings' decision-making process.
SCOPE

The bill now amends Government Code Section 11126 (Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act) and Penal Code Sections 3041 and 3041.1, expanding its reach from probation to parole proceedings before the Board of Parole Hearings.

REQUIREMENT

En banc reviews by the Board of Parole Hearings now require participation by ALL commissioners holding office on the date the matter is heard, rather than just a majority as previously required.

En banc reviews conducted by the Board of Parole Hearings are now prohibited from being held in closed session, meaning they must be open to the public.

Governor-requested reviews of parole grant or denial decisions must now be reviewed by ALL commissioners specifically appointed to hear adult parole matters, rather than a majority. A majority vote of all reviewing commissioners is required to grant parole.

A commissioner who was involved in the original tie vote that triggered an en banc review must recuse themselves from participating in that en banc review.

ENFORCEMENT

The en banc review decision and the vote of each individual commissioner must be made a public record, increasing transparency of how parole decisions are reached.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
8
Key actions
1
Committee
1
Amendments
1
Mar 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 11, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jan 22, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Brian Jones
Brian Jones
RRepublican
CA
40