California Workforce Development Board: port automation.
Summary
Prior law, until January 1, 2024, required the Labor and Workforce Development Agency and the California Workforce Development Board to oversee a stakeholder process to develop recommendations on how best to mitigate the employment impacts of automation at the Port of Los Angeles and the Port of Long Beach. That prior law created an industry panel consisting of 10 members, as specified, within the agency to inform the stakeholder process. That prior law authorized the California Workforce Development Board to contract the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Labor Center to facilitate implementation and authorized the UCLA Labor Center to commission expert research and testimony to supplement the stakeholder process. That prior law required the industry panel to provide an annual update on the stakeholder process at a regularly scheduled meeting of the California Workforce Development Board. That prior law required the Labor and Workforce Development Agency and the California Workforce Development Board, upon the completion of the stakeholder process, but not later than July 1, 2023, to issue findings and recommendations on the most effective ways to implement policies and programs to mitigate the employment impacts of automation and the transitioning of seaport operations to low- and zero-emission operations on workers and individuals living in communities adjacent to the ports. This bill would reinstate the above-described provisions until January 1, 2029, to determine how to best mitigate national security, cybersecurity, workforce, and economic impacts of automation at California seaports. The bill would instead create an industry panel consisting of 17 members, as specified. The bill would require the Labor and Workforce Development Agency and the California Workforce Development Board, upon the completion of the stakeholder process, but not later than July 1, 2027, to issue findings and recommendations, as described above. The bill would condition the implementation of these provisions on an appropriation by the Legislature for this express purpose.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/21/25 - Introduced
→
SB826
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions. The diff reflects only a change in document formatting from a traditional printed bill layout (with line numbers and page headers) to a web page rendering of the same legislative text. All operative provisions, deadlines, panel composition, and conditions remain identical.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a printed document with line numbers and page markers to a web page layout with navigation elements (home, FAQ, search, etc.). No changes to the actual legislative language or policy content were made.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
2
Committee
3
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 30, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 867.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 12, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Laura Richardson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 826
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 826. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline