Employees and independent contractors: construction trucking.
Summary
(1) Existing law, as established in the case of Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 903 (Dynamex) , creates a presumption that a worker who performs services for a hirer is an employee for purposes of claims for wages and benefits arising under wage orders issued by the Industrial Welfare Commission. Existing law requires a 3-part test, commonly known as the "ABC" test, to determine if workers are employees or independent contractors for those purposes. Existing law establishes that, for purposes of the Labor Code, the Unemployment Insurance Code, and the wage orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission, a person providing labor or services for remuneration is considered an employee rather than an independent contractor unless the hiring entity demonstrates that the person is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, the person performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business, and the person is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business. This test is commonly known as the "ABC" test, as described above. Existing law charges the Labor Commissioner with the enforcement of labor laws, including worker classification. Existing law exempts specified occupations and business relationships from the application of Dynamex and the provisions described above. This bill would provide that mere ownership of a vehicle, including a personal vehicle or a commercial vehicle, used by a person in providing labor or services for remuneration does not make that person an independent contractor. The bill would state that this provision is declarative of existing law. (2) Existing law establishes the Motor Carrier Employer Amnesty Program administered by the Labor Commissioner and the Employment Development Department. Pursuant to the program, notwithstanding any law, a motor carrier performing drayage services may be relieved of liability for statutory or civil penalties associated with the misclassification of commercial drivers as independent contractors if the motor carrier enters into a settlement agreement with the commissioner, with the cooperation and consent of the department, prior to January 1, 2017, whereby the motor carrier agrees to classify all of its commercial drivers as employees, and the settlement agreement contains prescribed components, including, but not limited to, an agreement by the motor carrier to pay all wages, benefits, and taxes owed, if any. This bill would establish a similar program, known as the Construction Trucking Employer Amnesty Program, to be administered by the commissioner and the department. Under the bill, an eligible construction contractor would be relieved of liability for statutory or civil penalties, except as provided, associated with the misclassification of construction drivers as independent contractors, if the eligible construction contractor executes a settlement agreement negotiated with, or approved by, the commissioner prior to January 1, 2029, whereby the eligible construction contractor agrees to properly classify all drivers performing construction work on their behalf as employees and the settlement agreement contains prescribed components, including, but not limited to, an agreement by the construction contractor to pay all wages, benefits, and taxes owed, if any. If a construction driver declines to accept the terms of a settlement agreement, the bill would still require an eligible construction contractor to reclassify the construction driver as an employee and the construction driver would be precluded from pursuing a claim for civil or statutory penalties under specified provisions of law for a claim arising during the period of time covered by the settlement agreement. (3) Existing law requires an employer to indemnify their employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of their duties, or of their obedience to the directions of the employer, as provided. This bill would provide that the duty of an employer to indemnify their employee for all necessary expenses or losses applies to the use of a vehicle owned by an employee and used by that employee in the discharge of their duties. The bill would provide that, with respect to construction trucking, a commercial motor vehicle driver who owns the truck, tractor, trailer, or other commercial vehicle that they use in the discharge of their duties as an employee working for an employer would be entitled to reimbursement for the use, upkeep, and depreciation of that truck, tractor, trailer, or other commercial vehicle, as provided. The bill would state that specified provisions described above are declarative of existing law.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Jul 2025
Senate Passage
May 2025
Assembly Passage
Sep 2025
Signed into Law
Oct 2025
Introduced Feb 21, 2025
Signed Oct 11, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 8 comparisons
What changed between versions
10/11/25 - Chaptered
→
SB809
·
3 edits
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The diff reflects a conversion from a traditional chaptered legislative document format (with page numbers, headers, and footers) to a web-based bill text display format (with website navigation elements, version history dropdown, and digest key metadata). The actual legal provisions of SB 809 remain identical.
TECHNICAL
Removed traditional chaptered document formatting including page numbers, 'STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL' header, and running headers/footers with chapter number and page markers.
Added website navigation elements (home, accessibility, FAQ, feedback, sitemap, login, quick search fields) and a version history dropdown listing all bill versions from Introduced (02/21/25) through Chaptered (10/11/25).
Added a 'Digest Key' metadata block showing Vote: MAJORITY, Appropriation: NO, Fiscal Committee: YES, Local Program: NO, and a publication date of 10/13/2025.
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2025 · Assembly Sep 13, 2025
How they voted
28–10
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
May 29, 2025
D
Democratic30
93% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
17
Committee
6
Amendments
10
Oct 11, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 13, 2025
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-12-5)
assembly
Sep 13, 2025
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 29. Noes 8. Page 3028.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 12, 2025
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 12, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 63. Noes 12. Page 3405.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 29, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (August 29).
lower
Jul 16, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jul 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 9). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 5, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & E. and JUD.
lower
May 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 10. Page 1339.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 1214.) (May 23).
upper
May 6, 2025
Upper · Passed
May 12 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 1. Page 838.) (April 22).
upper
Apr 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 739.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 28, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
Mar 12, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and JUD.
upper
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 809
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 809. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline