The Youth Rehabilitation and Opportunity Act.
Summary
Existing law requires the Board of Parole Hearings to conduct a youth offender parole hearing for offenders sentenced to state prison who committed specified crimes when they were under 25 years of age. Existing law makes a person who was convicted of a controlling offense that was committed when the person was under 18 years of age and for which the sentence is life without the possibility of parole eligible for release on parole at a youth offender hearing by the board during the person's 25th year of incarceration. Existing law specifies that these provisions do not alter the rights of a victim at a parole hearing. Under existing law, a murder perpetrated by specified means or under certain circumstances is defined as murder of the first degree. Existing law, as added by Proposition 7, an initiative measure approved by the voters at the November 7, 1978, statewide general election, requires that a person convicted of first-degree murder be subject to death or confinement in prison for a term of life without the possibility of parole in any case in which specified special circumstances are charged and found to be true. Proposition 7 does not provide for amendment by the Legislature. This bill, the Youth Rehabilitation and Opportunity Act, would instead make a person who was convicted of a controlling offense that was committed when the person was 25 years of age or younger and for which they were sentenced to life without the possibility of parole eligible for parole after their 25th year of incarceration, except as specified. The bill would require the board to complete, by January 1, 2028, all hearings for individuals who are or will be entitled to have their parole suitability considered at a youth offender parole hearing by these provisions, as specified.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Jun 2025
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025
Last action Jun 3, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
06/13/25 - Amended Assembly
→
SB672
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions of SB 672. The differences are entirely presentational: the bill text was reformatted from a traditional printed legislative document (with line numbers, page headers, and column layout) into a web-based display format with navigation elements, a search interface, and version history links. All operative provisions remain identical.
TECHNICAL
The bill was reformatted from a traditional printed legislative document layout (with line numbers, page headers, and two-column formatting) into a web-based display format that includes site navigation elements, a quick search bar, version history dropdown, and share/track links. No changes to the actual statutory text of Section 3051 were made.
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2025
How they voted
24–11
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 40
Jun 3, 2025
D
Democratic30
80% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
6
Committee
3
Amendments
4
Jun 13, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 9, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 11. Page 1450.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 1209.) (May 23).
upper
Apr 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 842.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 5, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 672
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 672. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline