The California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, which is administered by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, is established to promote beverage container recycling. The act defines "beverage container" to mean the individual, separate bottle, can, jar, carton, or other receptacle, however denominated, in which a beverage is sold, and that is constructed of metal, glass, or plastic, or other material, or any combination of these materials, but does not include cups or other similar open or loosely sealed receptacles. A violation of the act is a crime. Existing law authorizes the department, subject to the availability of funds, to pay a quality incentive payment of up to $180 per ton to qualified recyclers for thermoform plastic containers diverted from curbside recycling programs, as provided. This bill would delete that authorization. The bill would instead require, on and after January 1, 2027, if a beverage is subject to the act and offered for sale in a plastic beverage container with a plastic cap, beverage manufacturers to ensure that the container has a cap that is tethered to the container that prevents the separation of the cap from the container when the cap is removed from the container by the consumer. The bill would exempt, until January 1, 2028, any type of beverage container with a recycling rate of better than 70% for calendar years 2022 and 2023, as determined by the department, from compliance with that requirement. The bill would exempt beverage containers with a capacity of 2 liters or more and beverage containers that contain beer or other malt beverages, wine or distilled spirits, or 100% fruit juice from the scope of the bill. The bill would also exempt a refillable plastic beverage container and a beverage manufacturer that sold or transferred 16,000,000 or fewer plastic beverage containers, as provided, during the previous calendar year from the scope of the bill. By creating a new requirement under the act, a violation of which would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
The March 5 amendment to SB 45 shifts the tethered-cap obligation from a container-level requirement to one imposed directly on beverage manufacturers, adds two new exemptions (refillable containers and small manufacturers selling 16 million or fewer plastic containers per year), and replaces a standalone definition of 'beverage container' with cross-references to existing statutory definitions. These changes narrow the bill's practical reach by carving out smaller producers and refillable products while making the compliance duty explicit on manufacturers rather than on the containers themselves.
REQUIREMENT
The obligation is now explicitly placed on 'beverage manufacturers' who 'shall ensure' their containers have tethered caps, replacing the prior language that described a requirement for containers 'intended for sale in this state.'
ELIGIBILITY
New exemption for refillable plastic beverage containers from the tethered-cap requirement.
New exemption for beverage manufacturers that sold or transferred 16,000,000 or fewer plastic beverage containers in the state during the previous calendar year.
DEFINITION
The standalone definition of 'beverage container' (individual bottle, can, jar, carton holding less than three liters of plastic) was removed and replaced with a cross-reference to definitions in Sections 14504, 14505, or 14517 of the Public Resources Code.
SCOPE
The phrase 'intended for sale in this state' was removed from the core requirement, narrowing the geographic trigger to beverages actually 'offered for sale' in plastic containers with plastic caps.
The Senate amendment significantly narrows the scope of SB 45's tethered cap requirement. The bill now applies only to plastic beverage containers with plastic caps (rather than all beverage containers), lowers the capacity exemption threshold from 3 liters to 2 liters, and adds exemptions for beer/malt beverages, wine/distilled spirits, and 100% fruit juice. These changes substantially reduce the number of products subject to the tethered cap mandate.
SCOPE
The tethered cap requirement now applies only when a beverage is offered for sale in a plastic beverage container with a plastic cap, rather than all beverage containers intended for sale in the state. Containers with non-plastic caps or non-plastic bodies are no longer covered.
ELIGIBILITY
The capacity exemption threshold was lowered from 3 liters to 2 liters, meaning containers between 2 and 3 liters that were previously required to have tethered caps are now exempt.
New exemptions added for beverage containers used to hold beer and other malt beverages, wine and distilled spirits, and 100% fruit juice. These product categories are entirely excluded from the tethered cap requirement.
DEFINITION
The definition of 'beverage container' was revised to incorporate existing statutory definitions from Sections 14504, 14505, and 14517 of the Public Resources Code, rather than relying solely on a standalone definition in the bill.
TECHNICAL
Senator Blakespear was added as a co-sponsor alongside Senator Padilla.
03/05/25 - Amended Senate→SB45·1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions. The differences are entirely presentational: the old version shows a traditional formatted legislative document with line numbers and page headers, while the new version is a web-based rendering of the same bill text with navigation menus, search tools, and different layout. The actual legal content - including all sections, exemptions, dates, and thresholds - is identical.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a traditional legislative document layout (with line numbers, page headers/footers, and column formatting) to a web-based presentation with navigation elements, search functionality, and version selector. No changes to the substantive legal provisions were made.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Amendments
2
Feb 2, 2026
Failure
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
upper
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
May 16, 2025
Other
Set for hearing May 23.
upper
Apr 7, 2025
Other
April 7 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Mar 28, 2025
Other
Set for hearing April 7.
upper
Mar 19, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 421.) (March 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Mar 3, 2025
Other
Set for hearing March 19.
upper
Feb 27, 2025
Upper · Passed
March 5 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 25, 2025
Other
Set for hearing March 5.
upper
Feb 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jan 29, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jan 6, 2025
Reading-1
Read first time.
upper
Dec 13, 2024
Other
From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 12.
upper
Dec 12, 2024
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.