California Environmental Quality Act: defensible space.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. Existing law requires a person who owns, leases, controls, operates, or maintains specified structures within certain areas to maintain a defensible space around the structures meeting certain requirements. This bill would exempt from CEQA projects undertaken or approved by a public agency for purposes of maintaining defensible space to comply with the above requirements. Because a lead agency would be required to determine the applicability of the exemption, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/18/25 - Introduced
→
SB426
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The difference is entirely presentational: the first version is a traditional printed legislative document with line numbers and page headers, while the second is a web-scraped rendering of the same bill from the California legislature website, complete with navigation menus and site chrome.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a traditional legislative document layout (with line numbers, page headers, and fixed-width formatting) to a web page presentation that includes site navigation elements such as 'skip to content,' 'home,' 'accessibility,' 'FAQ,' 'feedback,' 'sitemap,' 'login,' search fields, and bill tracking links. The actual operative language of the bill is unchanged.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
6
Key actions
0
Committee
1
Feb 26, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and N.R. & W.
upper
Feb 18, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marie Alvarado-Gil
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 426
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 426. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline