Criminal procedure: protective orders.
Summary
Existing law allows the court to issue a protective order restraining a defendant from any contact with the victim if the defendant has been convicted of a crime of domestic violence, human trafficking, a crime in furtherance of a criminal street gang, or a registerable sex offense. Under existing law, the protective order may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. This bill would additionally allow the court to issue a permanent protective order restraining a defendant from any contact with the victim if the defendant has been convicted of any serious or violent felony, as defined, or any felony requiring registration as a sex offender. The bill would also authorize the court to permanently extend certain previously issued orders under certain circumstances. The bill would require the Judicial Council to develop forms, instructions, and rules relating to these orders. The bill would make other conforming changes. By authorizing the issuance of protective orders in certain circumstances and the extension of certain protective orders, a violation of which is punishable as a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/18/25 - Introduced
→
SB421
·
2 edits
MINOR
The diff does not reflect a substantive legislative amendment. The entire formal bill text of SB 421 (which addresses criminal protective orders, including authorizing permanent no-contact orders for defendants convicted of serious or violent felonies and sex offenses) was removed and replaced with website navigation elements such as menu links, search fields, and page headers. This appears to be a data capture or document retrieval error rather than an actual change to the bill's content.
TECHNICAL
The complete formal legislative text of SB 421, including all amendments to Family Code Section 6383 and Penal Code Sections 136.2, 1203.4, 1203.4a, 1203.4b, 1203.41, and 1203.425, was removed from the document.
Website navigation and UI elements were inserted in place of the bill text, including menu items (home, accessibility, FAQ, sitemap, login), search fields, page section headers (Bill Information, California Law, Publications, Votes, History, Bill Analysis), and version tracking labels. These are not legislative content.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
6
Key actions
0
Committee
2
Apr 1, 2025
Committee
April 1 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 3. Page 611.) Reconsideration granted.
upper
Feb 26, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 18, 2025
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 9 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Suzette Valladares
RRepublican
Co
Brian Jones
RRepublican
Co
Diane Dixon
RRepublican
Co
Juan Alanis
RRepublican
Co
Kate Sanchez
RRepublican
Co
Kelly Seyarto
RRepublican
Co
Marie Alvarado-Gil
RRepublican
Co
Roger Niello
RRepublican
Co
Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh
RRepublican
Co
Shannon Grove
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 421
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 421. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline