Community facilities district: inclusion or annexation of territory: County of San Mateo.

In subdivision (a)(2)(A) and (B), the condition for waiving landowner consent was changed from 'portions of the territory' having existing entitlements, zoning, or development to 'a parcel in the territory' having those attributes. This makes the test parcel-specific rather than portion-based, potentially making it easier to satisfy the exception since a single qualifying parcel may suffice.

The amendment introduced several apparent drafting errors: 'meet meets' (duplicated verb) in subdivision (a)(2), 'fordevelopment' (missing space) in subparagraph (A), and a stray '1,' inserted in subdivision (d)(4). These appear to be artifacts of the amendment process rather than intentional changes.

Added 'STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL' header and Chapter 652 designation.

Removed Senate and Assembly passage headers, blank date/time fields for the Governor's receipt, and the Private Secretary of the Governor signature line.

Reformatted line breaks and indentation throughout the statutory text and legislative counsel's digest to match chaptered bill layout conventions. No substantive wording changes.

Added the Governor's approval date (October 11, 2025) and filing date with the Secretary of State.

In subdivision (b), the phrase 'Notwithstanding any other provision of law' was changed to 'Notwithstanding any other law.' This is a minor wording adjustment with negligible practical effect on the bill's operation.

Standard enrolled bill formatting was added: passage dates (Senate September 3, 2025; Assembly August 28, 2025), Secretary of the Senate and Chief Clerk of the Assembly signature lines, and a Governor's receipt and approval block.

Line numbers, amendment history headers, and the original introduction date (February 14, 2025) were removed as part of converting to the final enrolled format.

In the San Mateo County shoreline exception, the old language allowed inclusion without landowner consent if portions of the territory 'have existing entitlements for or are zoned for development' of commercial, residential, or industrial uses. The new language requires that a parcel has 'existing entitlements for development,' removing the alternative of mere zoning designation. This narrows the exception by requiring actual entitlements rather than just a zoning classification.

Coauthors were added: Senator Wiener and Assembly Members Berman and Stefani, indicating the bill gained additional legislative sponsors during its Assembly passage.

A stray comma and number in a cross-reference to Division 1 of the Civil Code was corrected (removed ', 1' after 'Division 1').