SB 15 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Firearms.

Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Justice to conduct inspections of certain firearm dealers every 3 years in order to ensure compliance with specified requirements. Existing law requires inspections to include a sampling of between 25% and 50% of dealer records of each type. Existing law authorizes the department to assess a fee, up to $115, in order to cover various costs, including the costs of inspections. This bill would instead require the department's sampling of dealer records to include at least 25% of each record type. The bill would also authorize the department to periodically increase the inspection fee, as specified. The bill would require the department to annually inspect the 10 firearm dealer locations, as specified, with the highest percentage of total sales that were recovered by law enforcement and found to be illegally possessed, used in a crime, or suspected to have been used in a crime. The bill would require the department to conduct the inspections within 12 months of the release of its annual report unless the dealer location has been inspected within 6 months prior to the release of the report. Existing law directs law enforcement agencies to submit the description of a firearm that has been reported stolen, lost, found, recovered, or under observation directly to an automated Department of Justice system. Existing law requires these law enforcement agencies to report to the department any information in their possession necessary to identify and trace the history of a recovered firearm that is illegally possessed, has been used in a crime, or is suspected of having been used in a crime. Existing law requires the department to analyze this data and to submit an annual report to the Legislature summarizing this analysis, as specified. The bill would also require firearm dealers, commencing January 1, 2028, to maintain inventory records, as specified, at their place of business in a manner prescribed by the department. The bill would additionally require firearm dealers to produce an affidavit, under penalty of perjury, certifying the accuracy of all records, upon request. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires the department to keep a centralized list of all persons who meet the specified requirements of a dealer, licensee, or person licensed, except as specified. Existing law requires the department to remove various persons from this list, including those whose federal firearms license has expired or has been revoked. The bill would additionally authorize the department to remove a person from the centralized list who has willfully failed to comply with specified licensing requirements or who, among other things, failed to remedy violations discovered as a result of an inspection within 90 days of the inspection. The bill would make a violation of these provisions punishable by a fine and render a person ineligible for placement on the centralized list for 2 years from the date of removal from the list. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2024
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Dec 2, 2024 Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/05/25 - Amended Senate 03/13/25 - Amended Senate · 8 edits · Mar 13, 2025
MODERATE
The March 13 amendment to SB 15 makes several substantive changes to firearm dealer regulation: it caps civil fines at $1,000 for list removals, removes fixed dollar caps on annual fees (replacing them with 'reasonable fee' language), adds a new 90-day remediation requirement for inspection violations, removes the 50% upper limit on audit sampling, and narrows removal authority by adding a 'willfully' standard. The legislative intent section referencing gun violence prevention was also deleted.
ENFORCEMENT

The penalty for willful failure to comply with centralized list requirements is now specifically a civil fine not exceeding $1,000 (previously just 'a fine' with no stated cap). The ineligibility period language was also broadened from 'work for or engage in business-related functions' to 'own, operate, or be employed by' a firearms dealer or ammunition vendor.

Removal from the centralized list under paragraph (4) now requires that the person 'willfully fails to comply with the requirements of this article,' adding a willfulness standard that was not present in the prior version which simply stated 'failed to comply.'

REQUIREMENT

A new provision in Section 26720 requires a dealer found to have committed a violation during an inspection to remedy the violation within 90 days and submit proof of remedy to the department.

The audit sampling requirement during inspections was changed from 'at least 25 percent but no more than 50 percent of each record type' to 'at least 25 percent of each record type,' removing the upper cap and allowing larger sample sizes.

FISCAL

The fixed $115 annual fee cap for firearm dealers was removed from both Section 26720 and Section 28460, replaced with language allowing 'a reasonable annual fee' to cover costs. The CPI-based fee increase mechanism in Section 28460 was also deleted.

The $250 per year cap on fees for licensed manufacturers producing fewer than 500 firearms was removed from Section 29055, leaving only the limitation that fees shall not exceed actual costs of inspections and list maintenance.

SCOPE

Section 1, which stated the legislative intent to enact legislation regarding gun violence prevention, was removed entirely. The digest title also dropped the phrase 'Gun violence prevention.'

TECHNICAL

The fiscal committee vote changed from 'no' to 'yes' and the state-mandated local program designation changed from 'no' to 'yes,' reflecting a reclassification of the bill's fiscal impact.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
16
Key actions
5
Committee
5
Amendments
3
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Mar 27, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 26, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 532.) (March 25). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 13, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 14, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 29, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Dec 2, 2024
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors

Sponsors