SB 1377 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Immunizations: medical exemptions.

Summary
(1) Existing law prohibits the governing authority of a school or other institution from unconditionally admitting any person as a pupil unless, before the person's admission to that institution, the person has been fully immunized against various diseases, including any disease deemed appropriate by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law provides for medical exemptions from immunization requirements. Existing law requires the department to develop and make available for use by licensed physicians and surgeons an electronic, standardized, statewide medical exemption certification form to be transmitted directly to the department's California Immunization Registry (CAIR) and submitted directly to the school or institution at which the child will attend, submitted directly to the governing authority of the school or institution, or submitted to that governing authority through the CAIR where applicable. Existing law requires the form to be the only documentation of a medical exemption that the governing authority may accept. Existing law requires the department to identify medical exemption forms that do not meet specified criteria for appropriate medical exemptions. Existing law requires inappropriate or otherwise invalid exemptions to be reviewed by the State Public Health Officer or a physician and surgeon, and authorizes the revocation of the medical exemption. Existing law requires the department to notify the Medical Board of California or the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, as appropriate, of any physician and surgeon who has 5 or more medical exemption forms in a calendar year that are revoked. Existing law authorizes the appeal of a revoked medical exemption by a parent or guardian, as specified. This bill would repeal these provisions. Existing law, prior to January 1, 2021, exempts a child from immunization requirements if the parent or guardian files with the governing authority a written statement by a licensed physician and surgeon to the effect that the physical condition of the child is such, or medical circumstances relating to the child are such, that immunization is not considered safe, indicating the specific nature and probable duration of the medical condition or circumstances for which the physician and surgeon does not recommend immunization. This bill would exempt a child from immunization requirements if the parent or guardian files with the governing authority a written statement, as described above. The bill would prohibit the department, a local health department, or a third-party review panel from revoking, invalidating, or conditioning a medical exemption duly issued by a licensed physician and surgeon, except by final order of a court upon clear and convincing evidence of fraud. The bill would prohibit the department and local health departments from auditing, disciplining, or referring a physician and surgeon to the Medical Board of California or Osteopathic Medical Board of California based solely on the number of medical exemptions issued. (2) Existing law establishes the Medical Board of California and the Osteopathic Medical Board of California for the licensure and regulation of physicians and surgeons and osteopathic physicians and surgeons. Existing law authorizes the boards to, among other things, investigate and discipline licensees for misconduct. This bill would prohibit a physician and surgeon from being investigated, disciplined, or otherwise acted against by any state department or board based on their issuance of medical exemptions unless the medical exemption is found to be fraudulent or otherwise invalid. The bill would prohibit a medical exemption from being considered in any investigation or action against a physician and surgeon that is otherwise unrelated to medical exemptions. (3) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. This bill would prohibit a health care service plan or health insurer from denying coverage, imposing higher premiums, canceling a policy, or otherwise penalizing an enrollee or insured because a covered minor holds a medical exemption. Because a violation of this requirement by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of health facilities, as defined, by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law makes a violation of those provisions a misdemeanor. This bill would prohibit a health facility from denying medically necessary care on the basis of a medical exemption. Because a violation of this provision would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) The bill would require the State Department of Public Health to repeal or amend any regulation inconsistent with this bill on or before July 1, 2027. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status died 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2026 Last action Apr 16, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/20/26 - Introduced 03/25/26 - Amended Senate · 11 edits · Mar 25, 2026
MAJOR
SB 1377 was dramatically expanded from a minor technical fix to hospital chemical labeling rules into a comprehensive overhaul of California's immunization medical exemption system. The amended bill effectively rolls back the 2020-2021 reforms (AB 2769) that had tightened medical exemption requirements, replacing them with a simpler physician-certification standard and adding broad protections for physicians, patients, and families against government revocation of exemptions, insurance penalties, and denial of care. The bill also adds criminal penalties for health facilities and insurers that discriminate against children with medical exemptions.
Scope change
The bill was transformed from a narrow technical amendment to one hospital labeling provision into a sweeping legislative package that restructures California's entire immunization medical exemption framework, adds new criminal prohibitions on discrimination by health facilities and insurers, and provides broad protections for physicians who issue exemptions. It applies to all schools, child care centers, health facilities, health care service plans, and health insurers statewide.
SCOPE

The bill's scope was expanded from a single technical amendment to Section 1250.06 (hospital chemical labeling) to a multi-code overhaul spanning the Business and Professions Code, Health and Safety Code, and Insurance Code, covering immunization medical exemptions comprehensively.

DEFINITION

New Article 16 added to the Business and Professions Code (Sections 2380-2383) defining 'medical exemption' and establishing that physicians cannot be investigated, disciplined, or acted against by any state department or board based on issuing a medical exemption unless it is found fraudulent or otherwise invalid.

ELIGIBILITY

Section 120370 was repealed and re-added with a simpler standard: a child is exempt if a parent files a written statement from a licensed physician that immunization is not safe. The new version requires physicians to use 'accepted standards of care' rather than criteria established by the state department, effectively removing the state's ability to set its own medical exemption criteria.

Section 120375 was amended to prohibit schools from requiring disclosure of diagnosis or disability in support of a medical exemption, to classify medical exemption documentation as confidential medical information that cannot be disclosed without written consent (except to verify existence or by court order), and to prohibit sharing exemption status without written consent.

ENFORCEMENT

The old Section 120372 (which established a standardized electronic form, monitoring systems for physicians submitting 5+ exemptions, departmental review and revocation authority, and reporting to medical boards) was entirely repealed. The new Section 120372 prohibits the department, local health departments, or third-party panels from revoking, invalidating, or conditioning a medical exemption except by final court order upon clear and convincing evidence of fraud.

Section 120372.05 was repealed, eliminating the entire administrative appeals process including the independent expert review panel of three physicians that had been established to review revoked exemptions.

REQUIREMENT

New Section 1272.5 prohibits health facilities from denying medically necessary care on the basis of a medical exemption, creating a new criminal offense (misdemeanor) for violations.

New Section 1374.199 prohibits health care service plans from denying coverage, imposing higher premiums, canceling policies, or otherwise penalizing an enrollee because a covered minor holds a medical exemption. Violation is a willful crime under the Knox-Keene Act.

New Section 10127.22 of the Insurance Code prohibits health insurers from denying coverage, imposing higher premiums, canceling policies, or otherwise penalizing an insured because a covered minor holds a medical exemption.

TIMELINE

Section 12 requires the State Department of Public Health to repeal or amend any regulation inconsistent with the act on or before July 1, 2027.

FISCAL

The fiscal committee designation changed from 'no' to 'yes' and the state-mandated local program designation changed from 'no' to 'yes,' reflecting the new criminal penalties that trigger reimbursement obligations under the California Constitution.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
8
Key actions
1
Committee
3
Amendments
1
Apr 16, 2026
Committee
April 15 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 4. Page 3902.)
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B. P. & E.D.
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 20, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Brian Jones
Brian Jones
RRepublican
CA
40