Route 59: adoption.
Summary
Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of all state highways. Existing law describes the authorized routes in the state highway system. Existing law authorizes the California Transportation Commission to select, adopt, and determine the location for state highways on routes authorized by law, as specified. Existing law authorizes the commission to adopt an existing road as a state highway on an authorized route if the road is constructed to adequate standards. Existing law provides that State Highway Route 59 is from Route 152 northerly to Route 99 near the City of Merced and from Route 99 near the City of Merced to Snelling. This bill would, on or before December 31, 2030, require the commission to reach an agreement with the Counties of Merced, Stanislaus, and Tuolumne for the acquisition and adoption of county road J59 as a state highway, as specified. The bill would, on and after January 1, 2031, instead provide that State Highway Route 59 is from Route 152 northerly to Route 99 near the City of Merced and from Route 99 near the City of Merced to the junction of Routes 108 and 120.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2026
Last action May 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
04/06/26 - Amended Senate
→
SB1334
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The diff reflects only a change in document presentation format, from a printed legislative document with line numbers and page headers to a web page rendering of the same bill text. All operative provisions remain identical.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a printed document layout (with line numbers, page breaks, and column formatting) to a web page display format with navigation elements. No changes to the actual legal language or policy content were made.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Amendments
1
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 3874.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 6, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
upper
Mar 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
April 7 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
upper
Feb 20, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marie Alvarado-Gil
RRepublican
Co
David Tangipa
RRepublican
Co
Juan Alanis
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1334
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1334. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline