Regional wildfire partnerships.
What changed between versions
A new entity type called a 'regional wildfire partnership' is defined. It can be either (1) a cooperative arrangement, contract, or MOU between public regional entities and private entities (including insurers and utilities), or (2) a joint powers authority that enters into agreements with private entities. This broadens the bill beyond just public-sector collaboratives to explicitly include private-sector partnerships.
The amendment to Section 65100 of the Government Code (Planning and Zoning Law), which made nonsubstantive changes to provisions about city and county planning agencies, is removed entirely from the bill.
Section 4208.1 is now amended (previously only referenced as existing law) to add detailed operational requirements: regional entities must maximize risk reductions to people and property; regional priority strategies must address fire-resistant homes, businesses, and public buildings; project development and permitting must generate implementation-ready projects; forest management and community fire preparedness demonstration projects are required; and data collection and mapping of at-risk communities is mandated.
New legislative intent provisions require the framework to: provide a flexible suite of financing tools including revenue bonds; establish catalytic state investment to demonstrate viability; enable performance-based financing structures where upfront capital is supported by multiyear revenue commitments tied to verified risk reductions; encourage private utility and insurer participation while preserving regulatory flexibility; and maintain regional design flexibility without requiring participation by any particular entity.
The Department of Conservation is given new obligations under the revised Section 4208.1: facilitate peer-to-peer learning between regions, provide technical assistance to enhance regional capacity, assist regions in identifying funding sources, encourage local cost share opportunities, and publish on its website a list of funded entities, grant outcomes including number of people and properties protected, and progress toward statewide coverage of high fire hazard zones.
A new section (labeled Section 4208.2 in the Public Resources Code, separate from the collaborative formation section) requires regional wildfire partnerships to submit an annual report to the Department of Conservation by December 31 regarding whether funds other than program grants were used for projects in their regional priority strategies. The department must make these reports publicly available on its website.
The revolving fund is renamed from 'Regional Wildfire Mitigation Collaborative Revolving Fund' to 'Regional Wildfire Mitigation Collaborative Partnership Revolving Fund.' Revenue bonds may now finance both wildfire mitigation plans developed by collaboratives AND regional priority strategies developed by partnerships. The bill's appropriation status changes from 'no' to 'yes' and fiscal committee approval from 'no' to 'yes.'
A new eligibility rule is added: only a regional wildfire partnership is eligible for financing from the Revolving Fund. A regional entity that is not a regional wildfire partnership remains eligible for grants and other financing from sources other than the Revolving Fund. This creates a distinction between grant-eligible entities and bond-financing-eligible entities.
New legislative findings are added emphasizing that regional entities with local expertise are best positioned to develop tailored strategies, that sustainable financing requires aligning the financial interests of multiple beneficiary parties (local governments, water agencies, electrical corporations, insurers, reinsurers, state and federal agencies), and that I-Bank financing tools and catalytic state funding can lower transaction costs and attract private participation.