Local ordinances: administrative fines or penalties.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a local agency, as defined, to, by ordinance, make any violation of an ordinance subject to an administrative fine or penalty. Existing law requires a local agency to set forth, by ordinance, the administrative procedures that govern the imposition, enforcement, collection, and administrative review of those administrative fines or penalties. Existing law requires the administrative procedures to provide for a reasonable period of time, as specified in the ordinance, for a person responsible for a continuing violation to correct or otherwise remedy the violation prior to the imposition of administrative fines or penalties, when the violation pertains to building, plumbing, electrical, or other similar structural or zoning issues, that do not create an immediate danger to health or safety. This bill would require, for any violation pertaining to building, plumbing, electrical, or other similar structural or zoning issues, that do not create an immediate danger to health or safety, of any ordinance enacted by the local agency, the reasonable period of time to correct or otherwise remedy the violation to be no less than 6 months if certain conditions are met, including that the property involved is an owner-occupied residential property containing 4 units or less and the current owner of the property submits a sworn affidavit that the current owner was not responsible for any action that caused the violation and that the current owner had no knowledge of the violation at the time the owner took title to the property. These provisions would not apply to an administrative fine or penalty imposed for a violation of various laws, regulations, and ordinances, as specified. By requiring a sworn affidavit, the bill would expand the crime of perjury, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would require a local agency to extend the reasonable period of time described above by an additional 6 months upon a showing by the current owner of a good faith effort to correct or otherwise remedy the violation, and would authorize the agency to extend the reasonable period of time beyond that extension in its discretion, as specified. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2026
Last action Aug 27, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/30/26 - Enrolled
→
SB1272
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions. The diff reflects a transition from the formal enrolled bill document (with signature blocks and page numbering) to a web page rendering of the same bill text on the California Legislature website. All legal provisions, sections, and language remain identical.
TECHNICAL
The document changed from an official enrolled bill format (with Secretary of the Senate and Chief Clerk signature lines, page numbers, and chapter heading) to a web page layout with navigation menus, sidebar links, status timeline, and a digest key showing Vote: MAJORITY, Appropriation: NO, Fiscal Committee: YES, Local Program: YES.
Floor votes · Senate May 19, 2026 · Assembly Aug 24, 2026
How they voted
35–1
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
May 19, 2026
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
60% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
10
Committee
6
Amendments
7
Aug 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 24, 2026
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 5, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (August 5).
lower
Jun 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 17).
lower
May 26, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
May 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 1. Page 4339.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 4, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
upper
Apr 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Apr 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 4095.) (April 29).
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Mar 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 20, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1272
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1272. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline