SB 1243 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Unlawful detainer: Tenant Protections for Immigrant Families Act of 2026.

Summary
Existing law provides that a tenant is guilty of unlawful detainer if the tenant continues to possess the property without permission of the landlord after the tenant defaults on rent or fails to perform a condition or covenant of the lease under which the property is held, among other reasons. Existing law requires a tenant to be served a 3 days' notice in writing to cure a default or perform a condition of the lease, or return possession of the property to the landlord, as specified. This bill, the Tenant Protections for Immigrant Families Act of 2026 (Act) , would, until January 1, 2030, prohibit an owner of residential real property, as defined, from initiating or continuing an unlawful detainer action to evict a tenant whose income, ability to obtain income, or financial support is impacted by immigration enforcement activities until no sooner than 90 days after the tenant or household member's detention-related hardship ends, as specified. The bill would require a court to stay the proceeding of a pending unlawful detainer action against a covered tenant if certain conditions are satisfied, including that the tenant provides the court with specified documentation, such as a signed declaration of detention-related hardship that includes a specified statement, that the tenant or household member suffered a detention-related hardship that prevented them from paying the unpaid rent alleged in the unlawful detainer action. Any person who knowingly provides false information in the declaration of detention-related hardship would be subject to a civil fine of up to $1,500. Under the bill, if a tenant has raised detention-related hardship as an affirmative defense, an owner of residential real property may request an evidentiary hearing regarding the tenant's detention-related hardship stay of the unlawful detainer action, at which the tenant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence their detention-related hardship. The bill would prohibit the owner from charging or collecting any late fees, interest, or other penalties related to the nonpayment of rent by a tenant subject to these provisions. Within 90 days after the end of the detention-related hardship, the bill would require the tenant to either pay all past due rent or enter into a mutually agreed upon payment plan with the owner of the residential real property. For purposes of the Act, this bill would define "immigration enforcement activities" to include any efforts to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of any federal immigration law, including any federal criminal immigration law that penalizes a person's presence in, entry or reentry to, or employment in, the United States. The bill would define "detention-related hardship" to mean, among other things, loss of income or financial support by the tenant or household member due to detention, arrest, or ordered removal of a tenant or household member by any federal law enforcement agency. This bill would prohibit a landlord from charging a tenant subject to these provisions fees assessed for the late payment of that rental debt. The bill would prohibit a person from selling or assigning any unpaid debt as a result of detention-related hardship. The bill would prohibit a housing provider or tenant screening company from using an alleged debt as a result of detention-related hardship as a negative factor for the purpose of evaluating a prospective housing application or as the basis for refusing to rent a dwelling unit to an otherwise qualified prospective tenant. The bill would delete similar provisions related to debts as a result of COVID-19 rental debt. The bill would require the Judicial Council to review its existing forms and develop new forms to effectuate these provisions. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2030.
Bill status died 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026 Last action May 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons

What changed between versions

04/28/26 - Amended Senate SB1243 · 6 edits
MODERATE
The bill was significantly expanded from a narrow focus on tenants personally detained, arrested, or removed by federal immigration enforcement to a much broader scope covering any tenant whose income or financial support is impacted by 'immigration enforcement activities' generally. This includes indirect effects such as workplace closures in response to raids, increased childcare costs when a family member is detained, and lost income due to the general climate of enforcement. The change substantially increases the number of tenants who would qualify for eviction protections under the law.
DEFINITION

The definition of 'detention-related hardship' was expanded from a single narrow category (loss of income due to detention, arrest, or ordered removal of a tenant or household member) to a multi-part definition covering: loss of income or financial support due to immigration enforcement activities generally; increased costs or out-of-pocket expenses from injuries sustained during enforcement; loss of income due to reduced hours or workplace closure in direct response to enforcement; increased childcare costs when parents are transferred to detention or barred from reentry; and other circumstances related to enforcement that reduce income or increase expenses.

The definition of 'immigration enforcement activities' was expanded to explicitly include 'the increased presence of raids conducted by immigration enforcement authorities' as a standalone category, and clarifies that detention, arrest, or removal by federal law enforcement counts regardless of the individual's immigration status or U.S. citizenship status.

SCOPE

The 'covered tenant' definition was broadened from tenants specifically affected by detention, arrest, or removal to any person living in California whose 'income, ability to obtain income, or financial support is impacted by immigration enforcement activities.' This captures tenants who were never personally detained but lost work or income due to the broader enforcement environment.

The bill would delete similar existing provisions related to debts as a result of COVID-19 rental debt, replacing them with the new detention-related hardship framework.

REQUIREMENT

The 3-day notice to pay or quit must now include specific language advising tenants that they cannot be evicted for failure to comply if they deliver a signed declaration of detention-related hardship to the landlord within 15 days, with prescribed text in at least 12-point font.

TIMELINE

The Judicial Council deadline for creating or updating court forms was moved from January 1, 2028 to January 1, 2027.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
15
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Amendments
4
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 29, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 11. Noes 2. Page 3979.) (April 21).
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and PUB. S.
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 19, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ME
María Elena Durazo
DDemocratic
CA
26