SB 1234 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Dependency: fentanyl use.

Summary
Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, including when the child suffered or there is a substantial risk that the child will suffer serious physical harm, or a parent fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. Existing law requires a social worker who has cause to believe that a child meets the requirements to be adjudged a dependent of the court to immediately conduct an investigation to determine whether child welfare services should be offered to the family and whether proceedings in the juvenile court should be commenced. Existing law authorizes a court to make any reasonable orders to the parents or guardians of the child as the court deems necessary and proper. This bill would require a social worker, if an investigation involves an allegation that a parent or guardian has used or is under the influence of fentanyl or other opioids, to document whether the risk of fentanyl or opioid exposure to the child was specifically assessed, as specified. The bill would also require a juvenile court that finds a risk of fentanyl use, as specified, by a parent or guardian to order the parent or guardian to submit to testing for fentanyl. If the court finds a risk of fentanyl use, the bill would require the case plan for the parent or guardian to include certain resources, including, among others, information on the proper storage of controlled substances and prescription medications. By imposing additional duties on county social workers, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Senate Passage
Apr 2026
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026 Last action Aug 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons

What changed between versions

07/02/26 - Amended Assembly SB1234 · 3 edits
MINOR
The statutory text of SB 1234 is unchanged between these two versions. The changes are limited to the bill's short title (changed from 'fentanyl testing' to 'fentanyl use') and two fiscal designations: both the fiscal committee review requirement and the state-mandated local program designation were changed from 'no' to 'yes.' These administrative changes mean the bill will now go through fiscal committee review and be formally recognized as creating a state-mandated local program, which affects how the state handles reimbursement obligations to county agencies for the new duties imposed on social workers.
TECHNICAL

The bill's short title in the legislative counsel's digest was changed from 'Dependency: fentanyl testing' to 'Dependency: fentanyl use,' better reflecting that the bill covers both testing and broader fentanyl-related safety measures.

FISCAL

Fiscal committee review changed from 'no' to 'yes,' meaning the bill now requires review by the legislative fiscal committee before passage, which is a procedural step with potential budgetary implications.

State-mandated local program designation changed from 'no' to 'yes,' formally recognizing that the new duties imposed on county social workers (documenting fentanyl exposure risk assessments) constitute a state-mandated local program subject to California's constitutional reimbursement framework for local agencies.

Floor votes · Senate Apr 30, 2026

How they voted

360
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
Apr 30, 2026
D Democratic30
27 Yea 3
90% Yea
R Republican10
9 Yea 1
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
21
Key actions
10
Committee
6
Amendments
5
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jul 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 1, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 30).
lower
Jun 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 16). Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Jun 8, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 18, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and HUM. S.
lower
Apr 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4111.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 21, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3955.) (April 20).
upper
Apr 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HUMAN S. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 3869.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and HUMAN S.
upper
Feb 19, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 12 co-sponsors

Sponsors