Energy efficiency programs: discontinuance of administration.
Summary
Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Under existing law, the commission administers, or otherwise oversees, various public purpose programs, including energy efficiency and conservation programs, cost-effective energy efficiency programs, the Family Electric Rate Assistance program, the California Alternate Rates for Energy program, rate assistance programs for eligible food banks, and home insulation financial assistance programs. Under existing law, those programs are generally funded through a charge on electrical service, which is collected through customer rates. This bill would require the commission, no later than 180 days after filing, to consider and approve an electrical or gas corporation's application to discontinue administration of an energy efficiency program or an energy efficiency portfolio because the program is not cost effective, not reliable, or, in the case of an electrical corporation, because the program is not being used to meet unmet resource needs in its integrated resources planning framework, as provided. Because a violation of a commission order implementing this provision would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Last action Mar 4, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/19/26 - Introduced
→
SB1219
·
2 edits
MINOR
No substantive legislative changes were made between these two versions of SB 1219. The differences are entirely in formatting and presentation: the first version appears to be a plain-text or PDF extraction with line numbers, while the second is the same bill rendered as a web page on the California Legislature website, complete with navigation menus and site structure.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a numbered-line plain-text layout (with line numbers like 'line 1', 'line 2') into a web-page presentation that includes site navigation elements (home, accessibility, FAQ, feedback, sitemap, login), a quick search bar, and links to related bill information pages (Text, Votes, History, Bill Analysis, Status, Comments).
Minor formatting differences in the legislative counsel digest: capitalization changed from 'Vote: majority' to 'Vote: MAJORITY', and some spacing/line-break differences in how the digest paragraphs are displayed.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
3
Key actions
0
Committee
1
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U & C.
upper
Feb 19, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tony Strickland
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1219
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1219. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline