Gang databases.
Summary
Existing law, the California Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act (act) , provides specified punishments for certain crimes committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with a criminal street gang, as specified. The act defines a "shared gang database" as a database accessed by a law enforcement agency that designates a person as a gang member or associate, or includes or points to information, including, but not limited to, fact-based or uncorroborated information, that reflects a designation of that person as a gang member or associate that is accessed by an agency or person outside of the agency that created the records that populate the database. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to regulate and oversee any shared gang databases in which California law enforcement agencies, participate, as specified. This bill would remove the term "shared gang database" and make the provisions under the act applicable to all gang databases, regardless of whether a gang database is accessed by an agency or person outside of the agency that created the database. The bill would make specified regulations applicable to all gang databases beginning on January 1, 2027.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Last action May 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
03/25/26 - Amended Senate
→
SB1210
·
2 edits
MINOR
This diff reflects a reformatting of SB 1210 from a traditional printed legislative document layout (with line numbers, page markers, and column formatting) to a web-based presentation format. The substantive policy content of the bill - which expands gang database regulations from 'shared gang databases' to all gang databases effective January 1, 2027 - is unchanged between the two versions.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a printed legislative document with line numbers and page markers into a web-based layout with navigation elements (home, accessibility, FAQ, etc.). No substantive policy language was altered.
The fiscal committee designation is presented differently: the old version showed 'Fiscal committee: no yes' (indicating an amendment from no to yes), while the new version shows 'Fiscal Committee: NOYES.' The underlying information is the same.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Amendments
1
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 3983.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 19, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Akilah Weber Pierson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1210
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1210. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline