Tied-house exceptions: advertising: Counties of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and San Diego.
Summary
Existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, which is administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, regulates the application, issuance, and suspension of alcoholic beverage licenses. Existing law, known as tied-house restrictions, generally prohibits specified licensees, or their officers, directors, or agents, from giving or lending money or a thing of value to a person operating, owning, or maintaining any on-sale premises where alcoholic beverages are sold. In this regard, existing law specifically prohibits paying a retailer for advertising. Existing law creates a variety of exceptions to this prohibition, including permitting specified licensees to purchase advertising space and time from, or on behalf of, an on-sale retail licensee that is an owner, manager, agent or assignee of the owner, or major tenant of certain venues, subject to specified conditions. Existing law requires the purchase of advertising space or time, in this context, to be conducted pursuant to a written contract. In this context, existing law makes certain acts of coercion crimes, including when an on-sale licensee coerces other specified licensees to purchase advertising space or time. This bill would expand the above-described exception to tied-house restrictions that allows for the purchase of advertising by applying it to various facilities that are located in the Counties of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and San Diego, as specified. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would prohibit an on-sale licensee from soliciting a beer manufacturer, holder of a winegrower's license, a rectifier, a craft distiller, a distilled spirits manufacturer, or distilled spirits manufacturer's agent to enter into an agreement, as specified, that, among other things, includes a provision requiring, among other things, the prioritization of the sale or promotion of a specific alcoholic beverage product or brand. The bill would also prohibit a beer manufacturer, holder of a winegrower's license, a rectifier, a craft distiller, a distilled spirits manufacturer, or distilled spirits manufacturer's agent from entering into a contract or agreement, as specified, that requires the on-sale retail licensee to, among other things, prioritize the sale or promotion of a specific alcoholic beverage product or brand. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Counties of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and San Diego. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Last action Aug 27, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 7 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/30/26 - Enrolled
→
SB1195
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions. The diff reflects a transition from the formal enrolled bill document (with traditional legislative formatting, page numbers, and Governor's signature block) to a web page rendering of the same bill on the California Legislature website. All statutory text, venue listings, conditions, penalties, and findings are identical.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a traditional enrolled legislative document (with page numbers, chapter placeholder, and Governor's receipt/signature lines) to a web page layout on the California Legislature website, adding navigation elements, version history metadata, and bill tracking features. No policy content was altered.
Floor votes · Senate May 4, 2026 · Assembly Aug 26, 2026
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
May 4, 2026
D
Democratic30
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
13
Committee
5
Amendments
8
Aug 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 26, 2026
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 5, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 5).
lower
Jun 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 29, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (June 24).
lower
Jun 17, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
May 18, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
May 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4133.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 4132.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0. Page 3866.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 6, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Feb 19, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Susan Rubio
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1195
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1195. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline