SB 1095 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Fusion centers.

Summary
Existing law, the California Emergency Services Act, creates, within the office of the Governor, the Office of Emergency Services, which is responsible for addressing natural, technological, or human-caused disasters and emergencies, including responsibility for activities necessary to prevent, respond to, recover from, and mitigate the effects of emergencies and disasters to people and property. This bill would prohibit a law enforcement agency from participating in activity, cooperating, or disclosing or sharing information with a fusion center unless the elected governing body or council of the law enforcement agency, or governing board if no elected body exists, has entered into a written memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the fusion center. The bill would define "fusion center" to mean a state-owned center operated by the Office of Emergency Services or operated by an executive board consisting of local, state, and federal members, that gathers, analyses, and shares information. The bill would require the MOU to provide, among other things, that information shall not be shared with an individual employed by or contracting with a federal immigration enforcement agency or for immigration enforcement purposes, except pursuant to a judicial warrant, and that a violation of its terms shall result in the termination of the MOU and the withdrawal of the law enforcement agency from participation in the fusion center, as provided. The bill would also require the local governing body or council, or the law enforcement agency if no governing body or council exists, to publicly post a signed copy of the MOU on its internet website. By imposing additional duties on local governments with respect to fusion centers, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. This bill would, commencing January 1, 2029, and every 4 years thereafter, require the Department of Justice to conduct a performance and compliance audit of a representative sample of law enforcement agencies and fusion centers that includes any law enforcement agency that has had its MOU terminated, and submit that audit to the Legislature, as provided. This bill would authorize state elected officials and their accompanying staff to enter any fusion center for inspections, with 24 hours prior notice, as provided. This bill would, starting on January 1, 2028, and each year thereafter, require every fusion center in California to submit a report to the Department of Justice that includes specified information, including, among other things, any policies and standards for the use and retention of data gathered, processed, or analyzed by the fusion center and detailed procedures for requesting and conducting site visits requested by elected officials and their staff. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status died 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2026 Last action May 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

04/23/26 - Amended Senate SB1095 · 6 edits
MODERATE
The final version of SB 1095 makes several substantive changes from the April 23 Senate amendment: it broadens the definition of 'fusion center' beyond only OES-operated centers, requires 24 hours prior notice for elected official inspections (previously no notice was needed), shifts annual reporting responsibility from the Office of Emergency Services to each individual fusion center with a one-year delay, and replaces the blanket 'no reimbursement' mandate provision with a standard reimbursement-if-mandates-found clause.
DEFINITION

The definition of 'fusion center' was broadened. The old version limited it to 'a state-owned center operated by the Office of Emergency Services.' The new version defines it as a center 'operated by an executive board consisting of local, state, and federal members,' which could encompass more centers beyond those directly run by OES.

ENFORCEMENT

Elected official inspection access was significantly restricted. The old version allowed entry 'without prior notice or authorization.' The new version requires 24 hours prior notice and that inspectors agree to adhere to fusion center policies on confidentiality, nondisclosure, and privacy of sensitive law enforcement data.

TIMELINE

The annual reporting requirement was shifted from the Office of Emergency Services submitting a consolidated report starting January 1, 2027, to each individual fusion center in California submitting its own report starting January 1, 2028 - a one-year delay and a change in who bears the reporting obligation.

FISCAL

The state mandate reimbursement provision was changed from a blanket 'no reimbursement required' statement (based on the act creating a new crime) to a standard provision that if the Commission on State Mandates finds costs are mandated, reimbursement shall be made. This opens the door for local agencies to seek reimbursement.

REQUIREMENT

A new reporting item was added requiring fusion centers to include 'detailed procedures for requesting and conducting site visits requested by elected officials and their staff' in their annual reports to the Department of Justice.

SCOPE

Several report items were narrowed from plural 'fusion centers' to singular 'the fusion center,' consistent with the shift to individual-center reporting. The source of information requests was also broadened from 'governmental entity or data broker' to 'law enforcement agency, data broker, or other entity.'

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
16
Key actions
5
Committee
5
Amendments
3
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 3983.) (April 21).
upper
Apr 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 7. Noes 1. Page 3843.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on P., D.T., & C.P. and PUB. S.
upper
Mar 26, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Feb 26, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Feb 13, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SP
Sasha Pérez
DDemocratic
CA
25