Physicians and surgeons: licensure: expedite fee.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Department of Consumer Affairs under the direction of the Director of Consumer Affairs and sets forth its powers and duties relating to the administration of the various boards, including the Medical Board of California, under its jurisdiction that license and regulate various professions and vocations. Existing law requires a board to expedite the licensure process for certain applicants, including an applicant who has a specified relationship with an active duty member of the Armed Forces of the United States, as prescribed, and holds a current license in another state, district, or territory of the United States in the profession or vocation for which the applicant seeks a license from the board. Existing law establishes the Medical Board of California to enforce the licensing and regulatory provisions relating to physicians and surgeons. Existing law imposes various fees on applicants for licensure of physicians and surgeons, including an application and processing fee of $625 to be paid by an applicant for a certificate based on reciprocity, and an applicant for a certificate based upon written examination, as specified. Under existing law, all moneys paid to and received by the board are required to be paid into the State Treasury and credited to the Contingent Fund of the Medical Board of California. Existing law requires moneys in that fund to be available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, as provided. This bill would require the Medical Board of California to expedite the licensure process for an applicant who submits an application that is accompanied by, among other things, payment of an expedite fee fixed by the board at an amount equal to the cost of expediting the licensure process, not to exceed $250, as specified. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2030.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Jul 2025
Assembly Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2025
Last action Jul 14, 2025
Floor votes · Assembly May 27, 2025
How they voted
75–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 78
May 27, 2025
D
Democratic59
96% Yea
R
Republican19
94% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Jul 14, 2025
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 18, 2025
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 4, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D.
upper
May 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1736.)
lower
May 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 21).
lower
May 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 24, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 22, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Mar 10, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Avelino Valencia
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 967
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 967. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline