Pupil safety: comprehensive school safety plans: use of smartphones.
Summary
Existing law provides that it is the intent of the Legislature that all public schools, teaching kindergarten or any of grades 1 to 12, inclusive, operated by a school district, in cooperation with specified entities and individuals, develop a comprehensive school safety plan, as provided. Existing law provides that school districts and county offices of education are responsible for the overall development of a comprehensive school safety plan for each of its schools, as provided. Existing law requires a comprehensive school safety plan to, among other things, identify appropriate strategies and programs that will provide or maintain a high level of school safety and address the school's procedures for complying with existing laws related to school safety. Existing law requires the governing board of a school district, a county board of education, and the governing body of a charter school to, by July 1, 2026, develop and adopt a policy to limit or prohibit the use by its pupils of smartphones while the pupils are at a schoolsite or while the pupils are under the supervision and control of an employee or employees of that school district, county office of education, or charter school. Existing law, however, specifies circumstances in which a pupil may not be prohibited from possessing or using a smartphone, including, among others, in the case of an emergency or in response to a perceived threat of danger. This bill would instead authorize the prohibition on the use of a smartphone by a pupil in the case of an emergency or in response to a perceived threat of danger if that circumstance is explicitly addressed in a comprehensive school safety plan.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
Assembly Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Sep 2025
Signed into Law
Oct 2025
Introduced Feb 20, 2025
Signed Oct 3, 2025
Floor votes · Senate Sep 12, 2025 · Assembly Apr 24, 2025
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Sep 12, 2025
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
8
Committee
4
Amendments
5
Oct 3, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 13, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 3504.).
lower
Sep 12, 2025
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2962.).
upper
Sep 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 13, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jun 12, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 11).
upper
May 7, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1280.)
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 9).
lower
Mar 10, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joshua Hoover
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 962
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 962. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline