AB 93 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Water resources: data centers.

Summary
Existing law authorizes the legislative body of an incorporated city and the county board of supervisors to license businesses carried on within their respective jurisdictions and to set license fees, as specified. This bill would require a person who owns or operates a data center, prior to applying to a city or a county for an initial business license, equivalent instrument, or permit, to provide its water supplier, under penalty of perjury, an estimate of the expected water use. When applying to a city or county for an initial business license, the bill would require a person who owns or operates a data center to self-certify, under penalty of perjury, on the application that the person has provided its water supplier an estimate of the expected water use. When applying to a city or county for a renewal of a business license, equivalent instrument, or permit, the bill would require a person who owns or operates a data center to self-certify, under penalty of perjury, on the application, that they have provided the data center's water supplier with a report of the annual water use. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the Department of Water Resources, as part of any efficiency standard adopted under a specified provision of law, to identify different tiers of data centers, based on factors affecting water consumption, and appropriate standards for each data tier. The bill would define terms for purposes of these provisions. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Assembly Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
Sep 2025
Vetoed
Oct 2025
Introduced Jan 7, 2025 Vetoed Oct 11, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 9 comparisons

What changed between versions

08/29/25 - Amended Senate 09/05/25 - Amended Senate · 4 edits · Sep 5, 2025
MODERATE
AB 93 was amended to add new legislative findings about data center water and energy demand, narrow the statutory definition of 'data center,' and remove all Type I, II, and III data center tier definitions from the bill. The removal of pre-defined tiers shifts that classification entirely to the Department of Water Resources' regulatory authority when it adopts efficiency standards, giving DWR more flexibility in how it categorizes data centers.
SCOPE

New Section 1(b) adds a legislative finding that data center growth has created increasing demand for water and energy resources with implications for statewide sustainability goals, and that DWR has the technical expertise to develop efficiency standards balancing operational reliability with conservation.

New Section 1(c) adds an intent statement encouraging DWR to examine potential efficiency measures for data centers in consultation with stakeholders, including water use efficiency, energy demand management, and integration of emerging technologies.

DEFINITION

The definition of 'data center' was narrowed. The old version defined it broadly as 'a facility that houses computing infrastructure, including graphics and central processing units, servers, storage devices, networking equipment, and associated power and cooling systems.' The new version defines it only as 'a room, or portion of a room, in a building used primarily to house information technology equipment that serves a total information technology equipment load greater than 10 kilowatts and 20 watts per square foot of conditioned floor area.'

All three statutory data center tier definitions were removed: Type I (hyperscale, more than 10,000 kg/sq m, more than 10,000 servers, more than 25 MW), Type II (2,000-50,000 kg/sq m, 2-25 MW), and Type III (500-5,000 kg/sq m, less than 2 MW). DWR retains authority under Section 4 to identify tiers when adopting efficiency standards, but they are no longer defined in statute.

Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2025 · Assembly May 29, 2025

How they voted

3010
Passed
Total votes 40
Sep 10, 2025
D Democratic30
30 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican10
10 Nay
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
34
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Amendments
13
Jan 22, 2026
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 11, 2025
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2025
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 59. Noes 16. Page 3288.).
lower
Sep 10, 2025
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 10. Page 2811.).
upper
Sep 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 29).
upper
Aug 18, 2025
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jul 17, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 16, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 16).
upper
Jul 9, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Jun 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Jun 11, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and L. GOV.
upper
May 29, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 14. Page 1780.)
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (May 23).
lower
May 14, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
May 6, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 1, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (April 30).
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (April 8).
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W. P., & W.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W. P., & W. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on W. P., & W. and L. GOV.
lower
Jan 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 7.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Diane Papan
Diane Papan
DDemocratic
CA
21