Air pollution: indirect sources.
What changed between versions
Added legislative findings declaring that indirect sources (ports, rail yards, warehouses, major roadways) attract mobile pollution from across state and national borders, and stating legislative intent that CARB take a more active role in regulating these sources.
Added Section 39034.5 defining 'indirect source' by reference to the federal Clean Air Act definition at 42 U.S.C. Section 7410(a)(5)(C).
Amended Section 39602.5 to require CARB to adopt and enforce rules applicable to indirect sources of emissions, including consulting with affected districts, establishing fees on facilities and mobile sources limited to reasonable implementation costs, eliminating or minimizing impacts to disadvantaged communities, and prioritizing controls for the most significant pollution sources.
Added Section 39607.2 requiring CARB to establish a statewide reporting program to quantify emissions from indirect sources, including data from on-road and off-road mobile sources that visit those facilities but are not owned or operated by them.
Amended Section 39666 to add subdivision (g) requiring CARB to adopt and enforce rules applicable to indirect sources of emissions for toxic air contaminants, with fee collection deposited in the Air Pollution Control Fund and prioritization of controls in disadvantaged communities.
Added Article 7 (Section 39676) authorizing CARB to assess and collect reasonable fees on emitters of toxic air contaminants. Fees are limited to covering reasonable program costs, adjustable by the California Consumer Price Index annually, and deposited in the Certification and Compliance Fund.
Fees for indirect source regulations under Section 39602.5 and 39666 are deposited in the Air Pollution Control Fund and made available to CARB upon legislative appropriation.
Fiscal committee vote changed from 'no' to 'yes' and state-mandated local program changed from 'no' to 'yes,' reflecting that violations of the new CARB rules would constitute crimes enforceable by local agencies, triggering reimbursement analysis (which the bill says is not required because it creates a new crime).