AB 872 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Environmental health: product safety: perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

Summary
(1) Existing law, known as the Green Chemistry program, requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control to adopt regulations to establish a process to identify and prioritize chemicals or chemical ingredients in consumer products that may be considered as being chemicals of concern. Existing law requires the regulations to include criteria by which chemicals and their alternatives may be evaluated by the department, as provided. Existing law requires the department, following the completion of an alternatives analysis, to provide a regulatory response that may include, but is not limited to, not requiring any action and restricting or prohibiting the use of the chemical of concern in the consumer product. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2028, prohibit a person from distributing, selling, or offering for sale a covered product, as defined, that contains intentionally added PFAS, as defined, unless the department has issued a regulatory response for the covered product pursuant to the Green Chemistry program or the prohibition is preempted by federal law. The bill would authorize a manufacturer of a covered product to petition the department to evaluate a covered product and would require the department to evaluate and provide a regulatory response for a covered product under the Green Chemistry program, as specified. This bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2028, to adopt regulations to carry out these provisions. The bill would require the department to analyze and comment on the presence of PFAS in industrial processes and products, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to identify and categorize commercially active PFAS present in products distributed in California, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to report on other issues relating to products containing PFAS and emissive compounds. (2) Existing law requires the department, on or before January 1, 2029, to adopt regulations to enforce specified covered perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) restrictions, which include prohibitions on the distribution, sale, or offering for sale of certain products that contain specified levels of PFAS. Existing law requires the department, on and after July 1, 2030, to enforce and ensure compliance with those provisions and regulations, as provided. Existing law requires manufacturers of these products, on or before July 1, 2029, to register with the department, to pay a registration fee to the department, and to provide a statement of compliance certifying compliance with the applicable prohibitions on the use of PFAS to the department, as specified. Existing law authorizes the department to test products and to rely on third-party testing to determine compliance with prohibitions on the use of PFAS, as specified. Existing law requires the department to issue a notice of violation for a product in violation of the prohibitions on the use of PFAS, as provided. Existing law authorizes the department to assess an administrative penalty for a violation of these prohibitions and authorizes the department to seek an injunction to restrain a person or entity from violating these prohibitions, as specified. This bill would require the department to use this existing authority to enforce the prohibition on products that would be prohibited by the provisions in paragraph (1) . (3) Existing law requires the department, in consultation with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and all appropriate state agencies, to adopt regulations to establish a process to identify and prioritize chemicals or chemical ingredients in consumer products that may be considered as being a chemical of concern, as specified. Pursuant to that authority, the department adopted regulations known as the Safer Consumer Products Regulations. This bill would authorize, but not require, that those regulations evaluate uses of PFAS in products that would be prohibited by the provisions in paragraph (1) .
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2025 Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

03/24/25 - Amended Assembly 04/10/25 - Amended Assembly · 6 edits · Apr 10, 2025
MODERATE
The April 10 amendment to AB 872 integrates the PFAS product prohibition with California's existing Green Chemistry (Safer Consumer Products) program. It adds a new exception to the PFAS ban for products that receive a regulatory response under the Green Chemistry program, creates a new petition process (Section 25253.2) allowing manufacturers to request DTSC evaluation of their products, and removes a standalone legislative intent section that had called for future use-control regulations. The fiscal committee designation changed from 'no' to 'yes,' reflecting new regulatory cost implications.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded to formally link the PFAS product prohibition with the Green Chemistry program. Products that receive a regulatory response through the Safer Consumer Products process are now carved out of the PFAS ban, and manufacturers gained a new petition pathway to trigger that evaluation. Simultaneously, the scope narrowed by removing the forward-looking legislative intent to create separate use-control regulations under the Safer Consumer Products Program.
ELIGIBILITY

A new exception to the PFAS prohibition was added: a covered product is exempt if DTSC has issued a regulatory response for that product under the Green Chemistry program (Article 14, Chapter 6.5, Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code). This means products that go through the Safer Consumer Products process and receive a regulatory response are no longer subject to the blanket PFAS ban.

REQUIREMENT

New Section 25253.2 was added, allowing a manufacturer of a covered product to directly petition DTSC to evaluate the product for chemicals of concern (including PFAS). If a manufacturer petitions, DTSC is required to evaluate the product and provide a regulatory response under the Green Chemistry program regulations.

SCOPE

The entire legislative intent section (former Section 1 at the end of the bill) was removed. That section had expressed the Legislature's intent to enact future legislation authorizing DTSC to adopt use-control regulations on nonessential consumer products under the Safer Consumer Products Program, requiring risk-based prioritization by the Green Ribbon Science Panel, and requiring coordination with EPA.

TECHNICAL

Section numbering within Chapter 17.5 was reorganized: the prohibition moved from Section 109030.1 to 109030.2 (with 109030.1 left blank/reserved), and subsequent sections were renumbered (old 109030.3 became 109030.4, old 109030.4 became 109030.6, old 109030.5 became 109030.8).

The bill's operative clause was revised from 'An act relating to hazardous materials' to a more specific description listing the exact sections being amended and added (Sections 25252, 108076, new Section 25253.2, and Chapter 17.5).

FISCAL

The fiscal committee designation changed from 'no' to 'yes,' indicating the bill now requires review by the Legislative Fiscal Committee, likely due to the new regulatory evaluation requirements imposed on DTSC.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
9
Key actions
2
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S & T.M.
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S & T.M. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S & T.M.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S & T.M. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S & T.M.
lower
Feb 20, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Blanca Rubio
Blanca Rubio
DDemocratic
CA
48