Deceptive practices: service members and veterans.
What changed between versions
The bill now amends Section 1770 of the Civil Code (Consumers Legal Remedies Act) in addition to adding Section 401.5 to the Military and Veterans Code, significantly broadening the legal framework under which violations can be pursued.
New paragraph (25) requires anyone advertising or promoting a service or event about veterans' benefits to include a specific statement that they are not authorized to file an initial Aid and Attendance application or represent veterans before the Board of Veterans' Appeals, and that it would be illegal to accept a fee for preparing that application. The statement must appear in the same type size and font as the word 'veteran.'
New paragraph (25)(B) requires a second disclosure statement for events not sponsored by the VA, California DVA, or congressionally chartered veteran organizations, stating that no insurance products promoted are endorsed by those organizations and that they offer free advice to veterans.
New paragraph (24) prohibits charging an 'unreasonable fee' (defined as exorbitant and disproportionate to services performed) to prepare, aid, or advise applicants for public social services, which now explicitly includes activities of the US Department of Veterans Affairs and California Department of Veterans Affairs. Licensed California attorneys are exempt when providing representation in administrative or court proceedings.
New paragraph (26) makes it an unfair or deceptive practice to advertise, offer for sale, or sell a financial product that is illegal under state or federal law, specifically including cash payments for the assignment of a consumer's right to receive future pension or veteran's benefits.
The fiscal committee vote changed from 'yes' to 'no,' indicating a reassessment of the bill's fiscal impact following the expansion of scope.