Cyberbullying: off-campus acts: model policy.
Summary
Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to post, and annually update, on the State Department of Education's internet website and notify local educational agencies of the availability of a list of statewide resources, including community-based organizations, that provide support to youth, and their families, who have been subjected to school-based discrimination, harassment, intimidation, or bullying, as provided. Existing law requires a local educational agency to adopt, on or before December 31, 2019, procedures for preventing acts of bullying, including cyberbullying. This bill would require the department, on or before June 30, 2026, in consultation with relevant stakeholders, to develop, post on its internet website, and distribute to each local educational agency, as defined, a model policy on how to address certain reported acts of cyberbullying occurring outside of school hours and outside of the campus, as specified. The bill would require the model policy to clarify that local educational agencies are authorized, but not required, to address those acts. The bill would require each local educational agency, on or before July 1, 2027, to adopt a policy, or modify its existing procedures for preventing acts of bullying, on how to address certain reported acts of cyberbullying occurring outside of school hours and outside of the campus, as specified. The bill would authorize the adopted policy to be the model policy developed by the department or a locally adopted policy with input from stakeholders. The bill would require each local educational agency to post a copy of the adopted policy on its internet website and the internet website of each of its schoolsites. By imposing additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Jul 2025
Assembly Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Sep 2025
Signed into Law
Oct 2025
Introduced Feb 18, 2025
Signed Oct 11, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 7 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/29/25 - Amended Senate
→
09/11/25 - Enrolled
·
3 edits
·
Sep 11, 2025
MINOR
This diff represents the transition from the Senate-amended version to the enrolled version of AB 772, which requires the California Department of Education to develop a model policy on addressing off-campus cyberbullying and requires local educational agencies to adopt or modify their anti-bullying policies accordingly. The substantive changes are minimal: a duplicated word ('policy policy') was corrected, and a clarifying phrase ('adopted pursuant to Section 234.4') was added to specify which existing procedures LEAs may modify. All other changes are standard enrolled-bill formatting (removal of amendment history, addition of passage dates, removal of line numbers, addition of Governor approval block).
TECHNICAL
Fixed a duplicated word in subdivision (c)(1): 'policy policy' corrected to 'policy'.
Cleaned up garbled text in the legislative counsel's digest where phrases like 'as specified, which the specified' were corrected to proper sentence structure.
REQUIREMENT
Added the phrase 'adopted pursuant to Section 234.4' after 'existing procedures' in subdivision (c)(1), clarifying that local educational agencies may modify their existing anti-bullying procedures (those required under Section 234.4) rather than any arbitrary existing policy.
Floor votes · Senate Sep 8, 2025 · Assembly Jun 2, 2025
How they voted
30–7
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Sep 8, 2025
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
70% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
9
Oct 11, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 1. Page 3109.).
lower
Sep 8, 2025
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 8, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 7. Page 2617.).
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 29).
upper
Jul 14, 2025
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 30, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 27, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 25).
upper
Jun 11, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1843.)
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 23).
lower
May 7, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 22, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 9).
lower
Apr 2, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 3, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Josh Lowenthal
DDemocratic
Co
Isaac Bryan
DDemocratic
Co
Mia Bonta
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 772
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 772. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline