AB 767 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Sexually violent predators: schools.

Summary
Existing law provides for the civil commitment of a person who is determined to be a sexually violent predator. Existing law establishes a procedure by which a person committed as a sexually violent predator may petition for conditional release and requires the court, if it makes a specified determination, to place the person on conditional release. Existing law generally requires that a person released on conditional release pursuant to these provisions be placed in the person's county of domicile prior to their incarceration unless extraordinary circumstances exist requiring placement outside the county, as specified. Existing law prohibits a person being released under these provisions from being placed within 14 mile of any public or private school, as specified, if the person has previously been convicted of specified sexual misconduct of a child or if the court finds that the person has a history of improper sexual conduct with children. This bill would additionally prohibit a person being released under the above-described provisions from being placed within 14 mile of a day care center. The bill would define a day care center and private school for purposes of these provisions and would prohibit the subsequent establishment of a day care center or private school, including a private school that is a home, from rendering an existing placement noncompliant, as specified.
Bill status passed both 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Assembly Passage
Jan 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2025 Last action Aug 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons

What changed between versions

06/10/26 - Amended Senate 08/13/26 - Amended Senate · 5 edits · Aug 13, 2026
MODERATE
The August 13 amendment extends the 'grandfathering' protection for existing placements to day care centers, matching protections that previously applied only to private schools. It also adds clarifying definitions specifying what counts as an 'existing placement' (including locations a person returns to after a revocation) and when 'at the time of a person's placement' occurs (when the location was first recommended or identified). These changes prevent new day care centers or private schools from being opened near a released person's housing to force a relocation.
DEFINITION

Day care center definition now includes a provision that a day care center only counts if it was operating at the time of the person's placement, and that subsequently opening a new day care center will not make an existing placement noncompliant. Previously this protection applied only to private schools.

New clause (A)(ii) defines 'existing placement' for day care centers as including any location where a person is placed or was placed before revocation of conditional release and later returned to that same location.

New clause (A)(iii) clarifies that 'at the time of a person's placement' for day care centers means when the location was recommended or proposed under Section 6609.1 or was identified and being considered, whichever comes first.

New clause (B)(iii) adds the same 'existing placement' definition for private schools, covering situations where a person is returned to a prior placement location after revocation of conditional release.

New clause (B)(iv) clarifies that 'at the time of a person's placement' for private schools means when the location was recommended or proposed under Section 6609.1 or was identified and being considered, whichever comes first.

Floor votes · Senate Aug 27, 2026 · Assembly Jan 26, 2026

How they voted

400
Passed
Total votes 40
Aug 27, 2026
D Democratic30
30 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican10
10 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
26
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
8
Aug 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 27, 2026
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.).
upper
Aug 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 13, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 13).
upper
Jun 22, 2026
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 9, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 9).
upper
May 6, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jan 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 3832.)
lower
Jan 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (January 22).
lower
Jan 22, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Jan 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (January 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 6, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 5, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 12, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 11, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 3, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Juan Alanis
Juan Alanis
RRepublican
CA
22