AB 692 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Employment: contracts in restraint of trade.

Summary
Existing law declares every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind to be void, except as expressly provided. Existing law provides for a system of labor standards enforcement administered by the Labor Commissioner. This bill would, for contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2026, make it unlawful to include in any employment contract, or to require a worker to execute as a condition of employment or a work relationship a contract that includes, specified contract terms, including a term that requires the worker to pay an employer, training provider, or debt collector for a debt if the worker's employment or work relationship with a specific employer terminates. The bill would declare these contracts as contracts that restrain a person from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business, and as void and contrary to public policy, except as provided. This bill would authorize a worker who has been subjected to the above-described prohibited conduct regarding a contract or its terms or a work representative to bring an action on behalf of that worker, other persons similarly situated, or both, in any court of competent jurisdiction. The bill would make a person who violates these provisions liable for specified civil penalties and relief.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Assembly Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Sep 2025
Signed into Law
Oct 2025
Introduced Feb 14, 2025 Signed Oct 13, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 10 comparisons

What changed between versions

08/29/25 - Amended Senate 09/05/25 - Amended Senate · 5 edits · Sep 5, 2025
MODERATE
The September 5 Senate amendment to AB 692 makes several substantive changes to the bill's protections against employment contracts that impose debt or penalties on workers. The most significant change weakens the legal counsel requirement from mandating actual individual representation by an attorney (with conditions on who pays for and selects counsel) to merely requiring notification of the right to consult an attorney plus five business days. Additionally, the misconduct threshold for triggering repayment after termination was broadened from 'gross misconduct' to 'misconduct,' while 'material noncompliance' was removed as a valid basis for employer-enforced repayment in the retention period exception.
REQUIREMENT

The requirement that an employee be individually represented by legal counsel when negotiating a repayment obligation for a discretionary monetary payment (like a sign-on bonus) was replaced with a much weaker requirement: the employee only needs to be notified of their right to consult an attorney and given at least five business days to do so. The old version also specified that counsel paid for or suggested by the employer did not count as individual representation.

The requirement that a repayment obligation be set forth in a 'separate agreement subject to negotiation independent from the primary employment contract' was simplified to just a 'separate agreement from the primary employment contract,' removing the explicit independence-of-negotiation requirement.

ELIGIBILITY

In the exception allowing repayment if a worker is terminated, the threshold was changed from 'gross misconduct' to 'misconduct,' broadening the circumstances under which an employer can enforce a repayment obligation after terminating a worker.

In the retention period exception for discretionary monetary payments, the employer's grounds for termination that still trigger repayment were narrowed from 'material noncompliance or misconduct' to just 'misconduct,' removing material noncompliance as a valid basis.

TECHNICAL

Several instances of 'termination' were changed to 'separation' (e.g., 'early termination of separation' became 'early separation'), broadening the language to cover all forms of separation rather than only employer-initiated terminations.

Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2025 · Assembly Jun 5, 2025

How they voted

2511
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
Sep 10, 2025
D Democratic30
25 Yea 1 Nay 4
83% Yea
R Republican10
10 Nay
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
34
Key actions
13
Committee
8
Amendments
13
Oct 13, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 46. Noes 20. Page 3340.).
lower
Sep 10, 2025
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 25. Noes 11. Page 2815.).
upper
Sep 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 29).
upper
Aug 18, 2025
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jul 17, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 16, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (July 15).
upper
Jun 26, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 25, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 25).
upper
Jun 18, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and JUD.
upper
Jun 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 21. Page 2112.)
lower
May 29, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1788.)
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 23, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 3.) (May 23).
lower
May 7, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 11, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 10, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 10, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & E. and JUD.
lower
Feb 15, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors

Sponsors