California Public Records Act: cyberattacks.
Summary
The California Public Records Act requires state and local agencies to make their records available for public inspection, except as specified. Existing law requires each agency, within 10 days of a request for a copy of records, to determine whether the request seeks copies of disclosable public records in possession of the agency and to promptly notify the person of the determination and the reasons therefor. Existing law authorizes that time limit to be extended by no more than 14 days under unusual circumstances, and defines "unusual circumstances" to include, among other things, the need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine records during a state of emergency when the state of emergency currently affects the agency's ability to timely respond to requests due to staffing shortages or closure of facilities, as provided. This bill would revise the definition of unusual circumstances as it applies to a state of emergency to require the state of emergency, in addition to currently affecting the agency's ability to timely respond to requests as described above, to also require the state of emergency to directly affect the agency's ability to timely respond to requests as described above. By restricting the time period in which a local agency may respond to requests, thus increasing the duties of local officials, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. This bill would also expand the definition of unusual circumstances to include the inability of the agency, because of a cyberattack, to access its electronic servers or systems in order to search for and obtain a record that the agency believes is responsive to a request and is maintained on the servers or systems in an electronic format. Under the bill, the extension would apply only until the agency regains its ability to access its electronic servers or systems and search for and obtain electronic records that may be responsive to a request. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Jul 2025
Assembly Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Jul 2025
Signed into Law
Jul 2025
Introduced Feb 3, 2025
Signed Jul 14, 2025
Floor votes · Senate Jul 3, 2025 · Assembly Apr 24, 2025
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 40
Jul 3, 2025
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
60% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Jul 14, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jul 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 1931.).
upper
Jun 30, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.
upper
Jun 17, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 28, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1278.)
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 9).
lower
Mar 13, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 12, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 11, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (March 11).
lower
Feb 18, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Juan Carrillo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 370
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 370. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline