Apprenticeship programs: approval process.
Summary
Existing law provides for apprenticeship programs within the Division of Apprenticeship Standards within the Department of Industrial Relations, sponsored by specific entities and employers, and requires the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards to perform various functions with respect to apprenticeship programs and the welfare of apprentices, including the approval of new apprenticeship programs. Existing law makes any person who willfully discriminates in any recruitment or apprenticeship program, as specified, guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would require the Division of Apprenticeship Standards to confirm the completeness of an application for a new apprenticeship program within 30 days of receiving the application. The bill would provide that, where the chief has not made a final determination on a completed application for a new program within 6 months of receiving the application, the program shall have conditional approval to operate if it satisfies specified conditions, including approval by the United States Department of Labor. The bill would require the chief to make a final determination on an application for a new apprenticeship program within one year of receiving a completed application. The bill would provide its provisions do not apply to apprenticeship programs in the building and construction trades or to firefighter programs. Because the bill would expand the scope of an existing crime with respect to willful violations of provisions of the law related to discrimination in apprenticeship and preapprenticeship programs, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 29, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
01/29/25 - Introduced
→
AB345
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The differences are entirely in document formatting and presentation: the bill text was reformatted from a traditional printed legislative layout (with line numbers, page headers, and footers) to a web-based display format that includes navigation elements, search tools, and restructured digest labels. All legislative provisions remain identical.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a traditional printed legislative format (with line numbers, page markers like '99' and dash-prefixed page numbers) to a web-based layout that includes site navigation elements (home, accessibility, FAQ, feedback, sitemap, login), a quick search box, and restructured digest labels with explicit field names (Vote, Appropriation, Fiscal Committee, Local Program).
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Apr 23, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Mar 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 10, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Jan 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 1.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Corey Jackson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 345
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 345. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline