Employer-employee relations: confidential communications.
Summary
Existing law that governs the labor relations of public employees and employers, including, among others, the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the Ralph C. Dills Act, provisions relating to public schools, and provisions relating to higher education, prohibits employers from taking certain actions relating to employee organization, including imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on employees, discriminating or threatening to discriminate against employees, or otherwise interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees because of their exercise of their guaranteed rights. Those provisions of existing law further prohibit denying to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by existing law. This bill would prohibit a public employer from questioning a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organization's representation. The bill would also prohibit a public employer from compelling a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative to disclose those confidential communications to a third party. The bill would not apply to a criminal investigation or when a public safety officer is under investigation and certain circumstances exist.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Assembly Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 28, 2025
Last action Aug 29, 2025
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 3, 2025
How they voted
64–1
Passed · 13 other
Total votes 78
Jun 3, 2025
D
Democratic59
100% Yea
R
Republican19
26% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Aug 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 18, 2025
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jul 16, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 18, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and JUD.
upper
Jun 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 65. Noes 1. Page 1969.)
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 23).
lower
Apr 23, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Mar 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 6, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. E. & R.
lower
Mar 5, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. E. & R. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 18, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on P. E. & R.
lower
Jan 29, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 28.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Patrick Ahrens
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 340
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 340. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline