AB 32 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Tribal judges.

Summary
Existing law makes it a crime for a person to assault, among other people, a judge of any local, state, or federal court of record in retaliation for or to prevent the performance of their official duties, as specified. Existing law requires a county elections official to, upon application by a public safety officer, make confidential that officer's residence address, telephone number, and email address appearing on the affidavit of voter registration, as specified. Existing law requires, upon request of specified persons, including an active or retired judge, that the person's home address that appears in a record of the Department of Motor Vehicles be made confidential. This bill would additionally make it a crime for a person to assault a judge or former judge of a tribal court in retaliation for or to prevent the performance of their official duties, as specified. The bill would clarify that a tribal judge of a federally recognized California Indian tribe can request to make their records confidential pursuant to the above-described provisions. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2024
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Dec 2, 2024 Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

12/02/24 - Introduced AB32 · 3 edits
MINOR
The bill content is substantively identical between the two versions. The changes are purely formatting and presentation: the original introduced version with line numbers and traditional legislative layout has been reformatted into a web-based display without line numbers, with added website navigation elements (home, search, subscriptions, etc.). No policy language was altered.
TECHNICAL

Removed line numbers from all sections of the bill text

Reformatted headers, footers, and section breaks to match a web-based bill tracking system layout

Added website navigation elements including quick search, bill information links, subscriptions, favorites, and sharing options

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
10
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (March 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 4). Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 3, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and TRANS.
lower
Dec 3, 2024
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 2.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors

Sponsors