Agricultural theft prevention: retention and sale of agricultural commodity: holding and deposit of proceeds.
Summary
Existing law authorizes, upon reasonable belief that a person is in unlawful possession of an agricultural commodity, as specified, the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, a county agricultural commissioner, or any peace officer to hold or seize the commodity and requires the commodity to be turned over to the custody of the commissioner. Existing law authorizes the commissioner if, for any reason, the commodity is not released to the rightful owner after being in the custody of the commissioner, as specified, to sell the commodity and hold all of the proceeds derived from the sale of the commodity for a period of not less than 6 months, during which time the lawful owner of the commodity may submit satisfactory proof of ownership and obtain possession of the proceeds. Existing law requires if, after retention of the proceeds for a period of at least 6 months, no demand is made or if proof of ownership is not supplied, the commissioner to deposit the proceeds of the sale of the commodity into the general fund of the county. This bill would require the commissioner to hold the proceeds of the sale of a commodity for at least 3 months, rather than 6 months, before depositing them into the general fund of the county.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Jan 23, 2025
Last action Aug 27, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/30/26 - Enrolled
→
AB312
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions. The diff reflects a transition from the formal enrolled document format (with chapter heading, signature blocks, and page numbers) to a web page rendering of the same bill text with navigation elements added. The underlying legislative content of AB 312 is identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a formal enrolled document layout (with chapter heading, signature lines, and page numbers) to a web-based display format including site navigation elements such as search bars, links, and metadata fields. No changes to the actual statutory language of Section 884 were made.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 26, 2026 · Assembly Apr 1, 2025
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
Aug 26, 2026
D
Democratic30
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Aug 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.).
upper
Jun 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 30).
upper
Jun 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 7, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
upper
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0.)
lower
Mar 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 26).
lower
Feb 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Jan 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Juan Alanis
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 312
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 312. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline