Peace officers: tribal police.
Summary
Existing law provides that any person who comes within the provisions of specified statutes and who otherwise meets all standards imposed by law on a peace officer is a peace officer, grants certain authority to those individuals and their employing entities, and places certain requirements on those individuals and their employing entities. Existing law also grants specified limited arrest authority to certain other persons, including federal criminal investigators, park rangers, and peace officers from adjoining jurisdictions. Existing federal law authorizes tribal governments to employ tribal police for the enforcement of tribal law on tribal lands. Existing federal law requires the State of California to exercise criminal jurisdiction on Indian lands. Existing state law deems a tribal police officer who has been deputized or appointed by a county sheriff as a reserve or auxiliary deputy to be a peace officer in the State of California. Existing law, from July 1, 2026, until July 1, 2029, establishes the Tribal Police Pilot Program under the Department of Justice and the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training that grants peace officer authority to certain tribal police officers on Indian lands and elsewhere in the state under specified circumstances. Existing law authorizes the department to select 3 federally recognized tribes to participate in this pilot program, sets certain minimum qualifications and certification and training requirements for a tribal officer to act pursuant to this authority, and places certain requirements on the employing tribe, including a limited waiver of sovereign immunity and the adoption of a tribal law or resolution that authorizes the exercise of that authority and provides for public access to certain records. This bill would rename the pilot program to the Tribal Police Program and would extend the program indefinitely. Existing law creates the Tribal Police Pilot Fund in the State Treasury to, upon appropriation by the Legislature, assist program participants with the cost of information technology necessary to comply with reporting requirements for law enforcement agencies. This bill would rename that fund to the Tribal Police Fund.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2024
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Dec 2, 2024
Last action Aug 25, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/27/26 - Enrolled
→
AB31
·
1 edit
MINOR
This diff reflects a change in document format rather than a change in policy. The bill text moved from the formal enrolled legislative document (with page numbers, chapter heading, and signature blocks for the Chief Clerk, Secretary of the Senate, and Governor) to a web-based display version that includes website navigation elements and reformatted text. The substantive content of AB 31 is identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The document was converted from a formal enrolled bill layout (with page numbers, chapter heading, and legislative signature blocks) to a web page presentation format that includes site navigation links, bill metadata, version history, and status information.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2026 · Assembly Jun 2, 2025
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
Aug 24, 2026
D
Democratic30
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Aug 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0.).
lower
Aug 24, 2026
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0.).
upper
Aug 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 13, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 13).
upper
Aug 3, 2026
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 1, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 9, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 11, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1816.)
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 23).
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 3, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Dec 3, 2024
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 2.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
James Ramos
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 31
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 31. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline