Energy: nuclear facilities.
Summary
Existing law prohibits the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) from certifying a nuclear fission thermal powerplant, except for specified powerplants, and provides that a nuclear fission thermal powerplant, except those specified powerplants, is not a permitted land use in California unless certain conditions are met regarding the existence of technology for the construction and operation of nuclear fuel rod processing plants and of demonstrated technology or means for the disposal of high-level nuclear waste, as specified. This bill would exempt small modular reactors, as defined, from those provisions. Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) with regulatory authority over electrical corporations and gas corporations. Under existing law, it is the policy of the state that eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources supply 100% of all retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers and 100% of electricity procured to serve all state agencies by December 31, 2045. Existing law requires the PUC, the Energy Commission, and all other state agencies to incorporate that policy into all relevant planning. This bill would require the PUC, on or before January 1, 2028, to adopt a plan to increase the procurement of electricity generated from nuclear facilities and to phase out the procurement of electricity generated from natural gas facilities.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 23, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
01/23/25 - Introduced
→
AB305
·
1 edit
MINOR
The bill text of AB 305 did not undergo any substantive policy changes between these two versions. The differences are entirely presentational: the bill was reformatted from a traditional plain-text legislative document into a web page layout with navigation menus, search tools, and link elements. All operative provisions remain identical.
TECHNICAL
The bill was reformatted from a plain-text legislative document into a web-based display format, adding navigation elements (home, accessibility, FAQ, feedback, sitemap, login), a quick search box, and various page links. No substantive policy language was added, removed, or altered.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
6
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 17, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and U. & E.
lower
Jan 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 23.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joaquin Arambula
DDemocratic
Co
Diane Dixon
RRepublican
Co
Joshua Hoover
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 305
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 305. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline