AB 2617 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Protecting Kids from Online Gambling Act.

Summary
Existing law prohibits a person under 21 years of age from playing, being allowed to play, placing wagers at, or collecting winnings from, a controlled game, as specified. Existing law prohibits lottery tickets from being sold to persons under 18 years of age. Existing law prohibits specified unfair acts or practices undertaken or committed by any person in the operation of any contest or sweepstakes, including, among other things, using or offering for use any method, including an internet website or an online application, intended to be used by a person interacting with an electronic video monitor, mobile telephone, computer terminal, or similar internet access device, to simulate gambling. This bill, the Protecting Kids from Online Gambling Act, would prohibit operators of internet websites, online services, online applications, or mobile applications from making available, or advertising, online gambling activities or prediction market wagering to minors, as specified. The bill would prohibit the information collected for purposes of compliance from being used for any purpose unrelated to determining whether the user is a minor, and would require the information to be immediately deleted after age determination is complete, except as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General or a city attorney to bring a civil action for a violation of these provisions to obtain specified civil penalties, attorney's fees and costs, and injunctive or declaratory relief. The bill would authorize a minor who suffers actual harm due to a violation of these provisions, or a parent or guardian acting on behalf of that minor, to bring a civil action to obtain specified statutory damages and other relief the court deems proper. The bill would require the Attorney General to adopt regulations to implement these provisions, including regulations governing age assurance standards, on or before July 1, 2027. Existing law, the Unfair Competition Law, makes various practices unlawful and makes a person who engages, has engaged, or proposes to engage in unfair competition liable for a civil penalty, as specified. Existing law authorizes actions for relief prosecuted under the Unfair Competition Law to be brought by certain public attorneys and requires the penalty collected from those actions to be paid to the treasurer of the county or city in which the judgment is entered, as specified. This bill would specify that a violation of the Protecting Kids from Online Gambling Act constitutes unfair competition for purposes of the Unfair Competition Law. This bill would specify that its provisions are severable.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2026 Last action Mar 17, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/20/26 - Introduced 03/16/26 - Amended Assembly · 7 edits · Mar 16, 2026
MODERATE
The bill was transformed from a minor nonsubstantive cannabis code cleanup into a comprehensive youth online gambling protection law. The amended version adds an entirely new chapter (Sections 17950-17960) to the Business and Professions Code, creating the 'Protecting Kids from Online Gambling Act,' which prohibits operators from making online gambling or prediction market wagering available to minors and from advertising such activities to them. The original cannabis amendment is retained but renumbered as a secondary provision.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded dramatically from a single nonsubstantive technical fix to cannabis code language into a sweeping new regulatory framework protecting minors from online gambling and prediction market wagering, with enforcement mechanisms, private rights of action, data protection requirements, and a phased compliance timeline.
SCOPE

Entirely new chapter (Sections 17950-17960) added to Part 3 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code, creating the Protecting Kids from Online Gambling Act. The bill now covers both cannabis regulation and online gambling protection for minors.

A co-author (Assembly Member Bonta) was added to the bill, and the fiscal committee designation changed from 'no' to 'yes,' indicating the bill now has fiscal implications requiring review.

DEFINITION

New definitions established for 'advertise' (including algorithmic promotion, influencer marketing, affiliate marketing), 'covered service or application' (any public or semipublic website, app, or mobile application accessible in California), 'minor' (under 18 located in the state), 'online gambling activity' (table games, slots, lotteries, sports/fantasy sports wagering), 'predictive market wagering' (betting on future event outcomes like political, economic, or weather events), and 'operator.'

REQUIREMENT

Two-tier prohibition structure: Before January 1, 2028, operators may not make online gambling or predictive market wagering available to, or advertise them to, users if the operator has actual knowledge the user is a minor. On and after January 1, 2028, operators must reasonably determine the user is not a minor before making these activities available or advertising them.

Age verification data protection requirements: information collected for age determination must be limited to what is reasonably necessary, cannot be used for marketing, profiling, or any other commercial purpose, and must be deleted immediately after age determination is complete (except as required by law).

ENFORCEMENT

Violations constitute unfair competition under the Unfair Competition Law. The Attorney General or a city attorney may bring civil actions for penalties of $2,500 per violation, injunctive or declaratory relief, and attorney's fees. A harmed minor (or parent/guardian) may bring a private action for statutory damages of $2,500 per violation (capped at $1,000,000 per minor) or three times actual damages, whichever is greater, plus punitive damages and other relief.

TIMELINE

The Attorney General must adopt implementing regulations, including age assurance standards, on or before July 1, 2027. The stricter 'reasonable determination' standard (replacing the 'actual knowledge' standard) takes effect January 1, 2028.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
5
Key actions
1
Committee
3
Amendments
1
Mar 17, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on G.O. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on G.O., P. & C.P. and JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors