Horse racing: satellite wagering facilities: authorizations.
Summary
(1) The Horse Racing Law prohibits a satellite wagering facility, except a facility that is located at a track where live racing is conducted, from being located within 20 miles of any existing satellite wagering facility or of any track where a racing association conducts a live racing meeting, except, in the northern zone, the racing association or existing satellite wagering facility is authorized to waive this prohibition and consent to locating the new satellite wagering facility within 20 miles of the facility or track. This bill would expand that exception to the entire state. (2) The Horse Racing Law requires, before a satellite wagering facility may be licensed for the 1997 and subsequent calendar years, the department to conduct a one-year test at the proposed site in order to determine the impact of the proposed facility on total state parimutuel revenues and on attendance and wagering at existing racetracks and fair satellite wagering facilities in the Counties of Alameda, San Mateo, Santa Clara, and Solano. This bill would delete that requirement. (3) The Horse Racing Law authorizes fairs to contract for the operation and management of a satellite wagering facility with an individual racing association or a partnership, joint venture, or other affiliation of 2 or more racing associations or fairs that are licensed to conduct thoroughbred meetings or simulcast wagering within the northern zone. This bill would expand that authorization for fairs to contract, as specified above, for thoroughbred meetings or simulcast wagering within the state.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2026
Last action Aug 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
03/27/26 - Amended Assembly
→
AB2536
·
1 edit
MINOR
This diff represents a reformatting of AB 2536 from the official legislative document layout (with line numbers and page headers) to a web page rendering on the California legislature website. The substantive bill text is identical in both versions; all differences are presentational, including added website navigation elements and changed formatting of the same statutory language.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from an official legislative document with line numbers and page breaks into a web page layout with navigation menus, search tools, and metadata fields. No substantive policy language was changed between the two versions.
Floor votes · Assembly May 4, 2026
How they voted
72–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 79
May 4, 2026
D
Democratic59
93% Yea
R
Republican20
85% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Aug 3, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.
upper
Jun 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 13, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 4917.)
lower
Apr 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 22. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 6, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Mar 27, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on G.O. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Blanca Rubio
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2536
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2536. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline