CalWORKs.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, if the federal government provides funds for the care of a needy relative with whom a needy child is living, aid to the child for any month includes aid to meet the needs of that relative, except as prescribed. Existing law establishes the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program, under which each county provides cash assistance and other benefits to qualified low-income families using federal, state, and county funds. Existing law provides that the parent or parents are to be considered living with the needy child for a period of up to 6 months, or for a time period as determined by the State Department of Social Services, of the needy child's absence from the family assistance unit, and that the parents are eligible for CalWORKs aid and childcare services if specified conditions are met, including, among others, that the child has been removed from the parent or parents and that the family was receiving aid under when the child was removed. Existing law requires all applicants for or recipients of CalWORKs to ensure and provide documentation that each child in the assistance unit who is not required to be enrolled in school has received all age-appropriate immunizations, as specified. This bill would make technical changes to the provisions regarding a parent's eligibility to receive aid as if the child or children were living with them. The bill would also specify that those provisions do not require all children to be removed from the parent or parents or that some, but not all, of the children have reunified. If a family assistance unit is cooperating in the development of, or participating in, a reunification case plan, the bill would exempt a child that has been removed from the parent or parents from specified immunization requirements. For a family assistance unit receiving state-funded CalWORKs reunification cash aid whose grant was lowered as a sanction for not cooperating with child support enforcement, as specified, the bill would require the sanction to end upon the removal of the child from the assistance unit and their placement into out-of-home care. If an applicant applies for assistance for a child who is currently aided in another assistance unit and the county determines that the applicant has care and control of the child and is otherwise eligible, existing law requires the county to discontinue aid to the child in the existing assistance unit and aid the child in the applicant's assistance unit, as specified. Notwithstanding the above-described requirements to discontinue aid, if a child or children have been removed from their parent or parents and are placed with an adult who, prior to the removal, was a noncustodial parent, the bill would prohibit the county from discontinuing aid to the existing assistance unit if it is otherwise eligible for CalWORKs reunification cash aid, as specified. To the extent that this bill would expand county responsibilities under the CalWORKs program, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law generally requires a recipient of CalWORKs to participate in welfare-to-work activities as a condition of eligibility. Existing law requires the recipient and the county welfare department to enter into a written welfare-to-work plan that includes the activities and services that will move the individual into employment. Existing departmental guidance strongly encourages, for individuals receiving benefits as described in paragraph (1) , counties to use a CalWORKs family reunification plan, which is the case plan developed by the county child welfare services agency for the provision of services to those individuals, in lieu of the welfare-to-work plan. This bill would exempt an individual receiving aid or services for CalWORKs family reunification from the requirement to participate in welfare-to-work activities as a condition of eligibility. To the extent that this bill would expand county responsibilities under the CalWORKs program, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) This bill would make these provisions operative on July 1, 2027, or when the Statewide Automated Welfare System can perform any automation the department deems necessary to implement these provisions, whichever is later. (4) Existing law continuously appropriates moneys from the General Fund to defray a portion of county costs under the CalWORKs program. This bill would provide that the continuous appropriation would not be made for the purposes of implementing the bill. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2026
Last action Aug 26, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/30/26 - Enrolled
→
AB2510
·
2 edits
MINOR
The diff shows a transition from the formal enrolled bill document format to a web page rendering of the same bill on the California legislature website. No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions; the legislative text, digest, and all sections are identical in content.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from the official enrolled document layout (with page numbers, chapter headers, and formal signatures) to a web page display format that includes navigation links, bill status dates, and website-specific elements like 'skip to content' and 'Quick Search.'
Web page metadata was added including bill version history dates (Introduced Feb 20, 2026; Amended May 18, 2026; Amended June 15, 2026; Amended Aug 20, 2026; Enrolled Aug 30, 2026), publication date, and navigation links to related bill resources.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 25, 2026 · Assembly May 28, 2026
How they voted
30–9
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Aug 25, 2026
D
Democratic30
100% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
6
Aug 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 60. Noes 9.).
lower
Aug 25, 2026
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 8.).
upper
Aug 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 13).
upper
Aug 3, 2026
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 15, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Jun 10, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 28, 2026
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-7-14)
assembly
May 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 59. Noes 7.)
lower
May 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 14, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
May 6, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 15, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joaquin Arambula
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2510
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2510. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline