Curriculum frameworks: instructional materials evaluation criteria: media literacy.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Instructional Quality Commission and requires the commission to, among other things, recommend curriculum frameworks and the adoption of instructional materials to the State Board of Education. Existing law requires the commission to consider incorporating the Model Library Standards into the next revision of the English language arts/English language development (ELA/ELD) curriculum framework after January 1, 2024, and to also consider incorporating media literacy content at each grade level. Existing law requires the commission to consider including the Model Library Standards, including media literacy content, in its criteria for evaluating instructional materials when the state board next adopts ELA/ELD instructional materials after January 1, 2025. Existing law requires the commission to consider incorporating media literacy content into the mathematics, science, and history-social science curriculum frameworks when those frameworks are next revised after January 1, 2024. Existing law requires the commission to consider including media literacy content in its criteria for evaluating instructional materials when the state board next adopts mathematics, science, and history-social science instructional materials after January 1, 2025. Existing law defines media literacy, for the above-described purposes, as the ability to access, analyze, evaluate, and use media and information and encompasses the foundational skills that lead to digital citizenship. This bill would specify that those skills include, but are not limited to, an understanding of, among other things, time management and healthy behaviors on social media, the permanency of sharing material online, and how to maintain personal security and identify cyberbullying, predatory behavior, and human trafficking on the internet.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2026
Last action Mar 19, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/20/26 - Introduced
→
AB2452
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions of AB 2452. The diff reflects a reformatting of the same introduced bill text from a traditional legislative document layout into a web page format, adding navigation elements (search, menu links, share options) and removing line numbers and page headers/footers. The actual bill content - definitions, requirements, and dates - is identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a traditional legislative document layout (with line numbers, page headers, and column formatting) into a web page format with navigation menus, search fields, and share options. No changes to the substantive policy content were made.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
4
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Mar 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Heather Hadwick
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2452
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2452. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline