Downcoding medical claims.
What changed between versions
For health care service plans (Section 1371.01), the introduced version explicitly prohibited using an automated process, system, or tool to downcode a claim and required decisions be made only by a licensed physician or competent licensed health care professional. The amended version removes both of these requirements and replaces them with a single requirement: any determination to downcode must include a documented review of the clinical information supporting the billed service, evaluated against national coding guidelines (CPT) and standards from recognized medical societies, federal regulatory bodies, and major credentialing organizations.
A new subdivision (f) in both Section 1371.01 (Health and Safety Code) and Section 10123.148 (Insurance Code) requires the Department of Managed Health Care and the California Department of Insurance, respectively, to collect data on coding and claims adjustment practices including the percentage of adjusted claims, the percentage adjusted using automated systems, dispute rates, and dispute outcomes. Each department must evaluate this information and submit a report to the Legislature demonstrating the prevalence and impact of downcoding and upcoding on the claims process, cost of care, financial viability of provider practices, and care delivery.
The Insurance Code section (10123.148) for insurers retains the explicit prohibition on using automated tools to downcode in subdivision (a)(1), but adds a parallel documented clinical review requirement. This creates an asymmetry: insurers are still banned from automated downcoding, while health care service plans are no longer explicitly banned but must meet the documented review standard.
Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry was added as a coauthor of the bill.