State parks: Tolowa Dee-ni' Nation: Tolowa Dunes State Park.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the Director of General Services to execute grants to real property belonging to the state in the name and upon behalf of the state, whenever the sale or exchange of real property is authorized or contemplated by law, if no other state agency is specifically authorized and directed to execute the grants. Existing law finds and declares that California's state parks are a true reflection of the state's collective history, natural and cultural heritage, and ideals. Existing law requires the Director of the Department of Parks and Recreation to promote and regulate the use of the state park system in a manner that conserves the scenery, natural and historic resources, and wildlife in the individual units of the system for the enjoyment of future generations. Existing law authorizes the director to transfer specified park property to specified entities, as provided. This bill would require the Department of General Services to grant to the Tolowa Dee-ni' Nation, subject to specified conditions, all of the rights, title, and interest of the state in the land it owns within the Tolowa Dunes State Park, consisting of 3 parcels totaling approximately 4,301 acres. The bill would exempt that land from property taxation. By imposing additional duties on locals in the administration of this exemption, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Tolowa Dee-ni' Nation. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations related to a gift of public funds. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Last action Apr 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
03/23/26 - Amended Assembly
→
AB2356
·
2 edits
MINOR
This diff reflects a change in document format from plain legislative text to a web-based bill page rather than a substantive policy amendment. The operative bill content (the Amended Assembly version of AB 2356) is identical in both versions. The web page additionally displays the earlier Introduced version (02/19/26) at the bottom for comparison, which contains fewer historical findings and uses softer 'intent to enact subsequent legislation' language rather than the direct action language in the amended version.
TECHNICAL
The document changed from a plain-text legislative format to a web page layout with navigation elements (home, accessibility, FAQ, search, etc.) and metadata such as publication date and version selectors.
The web page now displays the original Introduced version (02/19/26) of the bill at the bottom for comparison. That earlier version had only 7 findings in Section 1(a) versus 10 in the amended version, and used the phrase 'it is the intent of the Legislature to enact subsequent legislation' rather than the amended version's direct 'the Legislature intends to do all of the following.'
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
6
Key actions
2
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Apr 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 24, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
lower
Mar 23, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W., P., & W. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 23, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
lower
Feb 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
James Ramos
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2356
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2356. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline