AB 2353 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Health Mandates Review Program.

Summary
Existing law requests the University of California to establish the California Health Benefit Review Program (CHBRP) to assess legislation proposing to mandate a health care benefit or service or repeal a mandated benefit or service and to prepare a written analysis. Existing law authorizes an appropriate policy or fiscal committee chairperson, the Speaker of the Assembly, or the President pro Tempore of the Senate to request that written analysis. Under existing law, a written analysis is requested to be provided to the Legislature not later than 60 days after a request for analysis is made. Existing law establishes the Health Care Benefits Fund, funded by an annual fee on health care service plans and health insurers, to support the University of California and CHBRP. This bill would require the Department of Health Care Access and Information to seek to partner with the University of California to develop a plan to establish the Center for Health Provider Policy Impact to assess and evaluate the impact of state and federal policies on hospitals. The bill would require the center to evaluate anticipated and actual impacts of proposed policies on health care delivery, access, workforce, and system sustainability and would require the center to create reports, at least annually, as specified. The bill would authorize the Legislature to request that the center review specific legislation or issues. The bill would establish the Health Provider Impact Fund. The bill would require the department to assess a fee for each hospital for the costs required to fund the above-described activities, as specified, thus imposing a tax. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2033.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Jul 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026 Last action Jul 1, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/19/26 - Introduced 03/16/26 - Amended Assembly · 10 edits · Mar 16, 2026
MAJOR
AB 2353 was substantially expanded from a general findings-and-declarations bill into a detailed operational framework creating two distinct review programs at the University of California: the existing California Health Benefit Review Program (for health insurance mandates) and a new Health Mandates Review Program specifically for legislation mandating services or activities on hospitals. The amendment adds specific triggers, deadlines, analysis requirements, funding mechanisms, and definitions that were entirely absent from the introduced version.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded dramatically from a general statement of legislative intent about identifying an independent body to estimate costs of provider mandates, into a specific operational framework with two distinct programs, defined triggers, deadlines, funding sources, and analysis requirements. The primary new focus is on hospital-specific mandates, while the existing CHBRP framework for health insurance mandates was also formalized with detailed analysis criteria.
SCOPE

A new Health Mandates Review Program is created at UC to assess legislation proposing to mandate new or additional services or activities for hospitals, beginning no later than January 1, 2028. This is separate from and in addition to the existing California Health Benefit Review Program which covers health insurance mandates.

The legislative findings were restructured from a general statement about 'health care providers' to specifically focus on hospitals. The intent language now references 'hospitals' rather than 'health care providers' throughout, narrowing the bill's primary target while the CHBRP provisions still cover health insurance mandates more broadly.

REQUIREMENT

The appropriate policy or fiscal committee in the legislation's house of origin must request a Health Mandates Review Program analysis if the bill is expected to affect operations of a majority of the state's hospitals, or a majority within a recognized class of hospitals, by requiring: hiring new staff or increasing workforce costs, purchasing or leasing new equipment, making physical alterations to facilities, or providing additional discounted or charitable care.

The Health Mandates Review Program must publish an annual summary by December 31 of each year covering legislation enacted that mandates new hospital services and their cost impacts if analyzed. It must also convene a workgroup of members with expertise in hospital finance or operations to advise on program development.

TIMELINE

The Health Mandates Review Program must deliver its written analysis no later than 72 hours before the legislation is heard in the relevant fiscal committee of the house of origin (or on a mutually agreed timeline). The existing CHBRP has a 60-day deadline.

FISCAL

A new Health Care Mandates Fund is established in the State Treasury to support the Health Mandates Review Program. Starting in the 2027-28 fiscal year, the Department of Health Care Access and Information must transfer an unspecified amount (left blank as $____) from the California Health Data and Planning Fund to this new fund annually by August 1.

The existing Health Care Benefits Fund (supporting CHBRP) is now specified with an annual fee on health care service plans and health insurers capped at $3,200,000 total per year for fiscal years 2026-27 through 2032-33. Fees are assessed by DMHC and CDI in consultation with UC.

DEFINITION

New definitions added: 'Hospital' (health facility under Section 1250(a) or (b)), 'Legislation proposing to mandate a benefit or service' (requiring insurers/plans to cover specific services), 'Legislation proposing to mandate new or additional services or activities' (requiring hospitals to offer previously unrequired services or increasing cost of existing ones), and 'Legislation proposing to repeal a mandated benefit or service.'

ENFORCEMENT

A prohibition is added stating there shall not be an independent review board process by the state for full data access to all claims payer database and hospital discharge data, limiting how the program can obtain financial data.

TECHNICAL

The fiscal committee designation changed from 'no' to 'yes,' indicating the bill now has a fiscal impact requiring fiscal committee review. A coauthor (Assembly Member Petrie-Norris) was added.

Floor votes · Assembly May 27, 2026

How they voted

551
Passed · 23 other
Total votes 79
May 27, 2026
D Democratic59
38 Yea 21
64% Yea
R Republican20
17 Yea 1 Nay 2
85% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
16
Key actions
5
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Jul 1, 2026
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 10, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
May 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 1.)
lower
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
May 13, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 29, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 27, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 21).
lower
Mar 17, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors

Sponsors