Regional housing need: affordable housing.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Housing and Community Development, in consultation with each council of governments, to determine each region's existing and projected housing need, as provided. Existing law requires each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to develop and adopt a methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or within the subregion, as provided. Existing law also requires each council of governments and delegate subregion, as applicable, to adopt a final allocation of regional housing needs to each local government in the region or subregion, where applicable, and the department, based on that adopted methodology. Existing law requires that the housing element of a county's or city's general plan include, among other things, a quantification of the locality's existing and projected housing needs for all income levels, which must include the locality's share of the regional housing need, as provided. Existing law authorizes a local government within the same county as a federally recognized Native American tribe to enter into a voluntary agreement with a tribe to allow new tribal housing development projects to count toward the locality's share of the regional housing needs allocation if certain conditions are met. This bill would authorize a local government, as defined, to enter into a voluntary agreement with another local government to allow new housing development projects to count toward each locality's share of the regional housing needs allocation if certain conditions are met, including that the project includes affordable housing units for very low and lower income households.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Last action Mar 9, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/19/26 - Introduced
→
AB2295
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The bill text, conditions, definitions, and digest language are identical. The differences are entirely presentational: the first version is a clean legislative document format while the second is a web-rendered version that includes website navigation elements (menus, search boxes, links) around the same underlying bill content.
TECHNICAL
The bill was reformatted from a traditional legislative document layout (with line numbers, page headers, and centered formatting) to a web page rendering that includes site navigation elements such as skip-to-content links, search boxes, and menu items. The actual statutory language of Section 65584.2.3 is unchanged.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
3
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and L. GOV.
lower
Feb 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Natasha Johnson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2295
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2295. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline